Writings on Lewis Baltz, John Gossage, Evan Connell, Frank Stella, Terry Conway, Guy Williams, Hitchcock, Wim Wenders, Kubrick, Joel-Peter Witkin, Thomas Barrow, Stanley Cavell, Robert Creeley, Plato’s Phaedrus, Ross Feld, Rachel Whiteread, James Baldwin, Allen Graham, Don Dudley, Carroll Dunham, …and then some…
Cover photo by Nicole Blaisdell Ivey
CONTENTS:
Editor’s Preface: by William Peterson
Foreword: by Stanley Cavell
Introduction: “On Slipping Across: Reading, Friendship, Otherness” by David Morris
On Photographs:
Absorbing Inventories: Thomas Barrow’s “Libraries Series”
Afterworld: Photographs of Joel-Peter Witkin
BLDGS: Photographs of Lewis Baltz
Space Begins Because We Look Away From Where We Are: Lewis Baltz, Candlestick Point
Buried Silk Exhumed: The Lewis Baltz Retrospective, Rule Without Exception
From Obscenity in Thy Mother’s Milk: John Gossage’s “HF!” Portfolio
Thirteen Ways of NOT Looking at a Gossage Photograph
On Movies:
Passion Misfits Us All: Wim Wenders’ Paris, Texas
Death’s Blue-Eyed Boy: Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket
Still Moving
Highlighting Hitchcock’s Vertigo with Magic Marker
On Painting:
Frank Stella’s The Whiteness of the Whale
Passion and the Pine Breeze: The Paintings of Terry Conway
Guy Williams: On In: Outside
Original Face: Allan Graham’s Moon 2
Poem: Omoide No Tsukimi
On Reading & Writing:
A Gloss Annexed
Vatic Writing: Evan Connell’s Notes from a Bottle . . .
Tell It Like It Is: The Experimental Traditionalists
Rebus
What Was Called A Thought Echoed in Sight: Yvor Winters’ Centennial
Poem: Occasional Loquats: For Janet Lewis
For Robert Creeley on his 70th Birthday
A Nobler Seduction
Slipping Across
Fiction: Radical Philosophical Reclamation & Wrecking, The TLP Hotel (4 Excerpts)
“This is the West, sir. When legend becomes fact, print the legend.”
–from John Ford’s classic 1962 western film, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.
Gus’s life was like jazz, the improvisation depended greatly on the depth of the cats he was playing with and the audience of the moment. Besides being a philosopher, poet, publisher, editor, essayist, critic and teacher Gus Blaisdell was a collector. He collected stamps, comics, autographs, ideas, experiences, quotes, books, music, art, and friends. And he took notes on all of them. His complexity and the improvisational quality of his life make it hard to know what he would deem most important. He thought of life (books, art, film, friends, wives, children) as moments and serendipitously interconnected pieces on his path from here to there. In a letter to his son Luc he writes, “… if I could give you anything I would give you my luck. But luck, it now occurs to me is not passive. Good sense can be made out of believing we have a hand in our luck, we help make it happen, get ourselves in shape for it and ready ourselves to receive it.”
Luck would have it that after Gus died I moved back to Albuquerque and became the guardian of his forty-plus boxes of papers. Boxes filled with friend’s manuscripts, screenplays, poems, and stories; his own manuscripts, letters, and journals; writings of and on Basho, Monk, and Wittgenstein, Altman, Matisse, Utamaro, Blake, and Bruebeck. Within this paper life live several different threads of Gus Blaisdell’s life from which I weave this one semi-chronological interpretation. There are no straight lines here. He writes, “The past is there, flat as an overturned headstone, bearing no legend, and as smooth.”
A favorite and fitting quote from Gus’s archive is by Charles Olson on Melville:
“His reading is a gauge of him, at all points of his life. He was a skald, and knew how to appropriate the work of others. He read to write.”
1935 Born Charles Augustus Blaisdell II in San Diego, California on September 21, the only child of Captain (later, Commander) Norman Earl Blaisdell of Foxboro, Massachusetts, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, and Mary Ann Hebert, an amateur pianist and a Bachelor of Arts graduate from Mount Saint Mary’s College, Brentwood Hills, Los Angeles. The couple is often mentioned in the San Diego Union Society pages as entertaining “at the cocktail hour for their many friends.”
1937 — 40 Norman moves the family to Arlington, Virginia, where he becomes Communications Officer on the USS Craven. In 1939 he studies at the Post Graduate School in Annapolis in Applied Communication. In Mary’s scrap book, along with photos of a happy Gus and his parents rolling Easter eggs on the White House lawn, is an invitation which reads: “Mrs. Roosevelt requests the pleasure of the company of Lieutenant and Mrs. Blaisdell on Monday afternoon December the ninth [1940] at four o’clock. Music: Miss Virginia Lewis, Soprano / Mr. Mieczyslwa Munz, Pianist / Mr. William L. King, Accompanist.”
1941 – 42 When World War II breaks out Captain Blaisdell is immediately deployed. He eventually serves in the Pacific as Fleet Communications Security Officer on the staff of Admiral Chester W. Nimitz. Later Gus writes, “My father, a career officer in the Navy, disappears from my life simply by reporting for duty.” So Mary drives young Gus from Virginia back to San Diego to live with her Irish Catholic mother and French Protestant father. Gus is allowed to take his comic book collection which fills the back seat and foot wells of their car.
Gus in military academy uniform with his parents, Commander Norman E. Blaisdell U.S. Navy, and Mary Ann Hebert Blaisdell, 1944
1943 – 45 Mary sends Gus at age eight to boarding school at Brown Military Academy (against his father’s wishes) while she joins the Red Cross. Gus is known as a good “little soldier” until he leaves Brown and starts public school three years later. He sees his father once during the war when Kamikazes damage his ship and it returns for repairs. When the war is over his father does not return. He becomes part of the occupying forces sent to Japan under Admiral Nimitz.
1947 Gus receives a reply from Commander Edwin T. Layton answering questions about the sword maker and the history of the Japanese samurai sword that Gus’s father brought back to him from the Pacific. “Your Dad’s Japanese samurai sword is indeed an old one, made by a fine sword smith, favored for fine blades. He was of the famous metal-smith and sword-smith family called Myochin.”
Fascinated with all things Japanese Gus later writes, “I bought my first Japanese print, Hiroshige’s famous Atake, A Sudden Summer Shower on the Great Bridge over the Sumida a couple of years after the Second World War ended. I was 12 or 13. . . . News of my purchase reached an elderly lady who collected prints under the tutelage of another collector. She invited me over. . . I recall going through a history of woodblock prints, beginning with Moronobu and ending with Goyo, three hundred years of an art. I left late in the evening with my second print, a Kuniyoshi of one of the Ronin dying.”
1949 Gus’s parents divorce and his beloved grandfather Luc dies. Gus is expelled from San Diego High School for hitting a teacher. His mother, now a social worker, sends Gus for a stay at the Anthony Home for delinquent, abandoned, and disturbed youth.
With public school no longer an option, Mary sends Gus to Saint Augustine’s High School where he says that the priests whipped him into shape. Besides the beach, Gus hangs out at Warhenbrocks Bookstore on Broadway and The Book Center at 5th and Ash owned by Lafayette Young, a good friend of Henry Miller. (He is the addressee of the “Letter to Lafayette” in Miller’s Air-Conditioned Nightmare.) Lafe becomes a “spiritual father” and mentor to Gus. “When I was a kid it was Lafe Young who first turned me on to Neruda; as well as Celine, Barnes (Djuna), Stevens, and Lowry.” In a later journal Gus writes, “My mother divorced my father after Korea. He had been at best intermittent during my childhood, disappearing immediately at Pearl Harbor, returning exhausted and raving only once during the war. . . .”
1951 His mother marries James William Casey, a probation officer and kind stepfather to Gus.
Gus writes a letter to his father Norman, “I started collecting books about three years ago. . . . Favorite contemporary authors are Waugh, Graham Greene, G. K. Chesterton and Hillaire Belloc. I am also trying (in vain) to obtain the ‘novels in woodcuts’ by Lynd Ward.” Gus corresponds with science-fiction writer Ray Bradbury about their respective comic book collections. Jane, Gus’s high school girlfriend writes, “When I met Gus, in high school, he was a passionately devout Catholic and was largely responsible for my conversion to that faith.”
1953 After graduating from Saint Augustine’s Gus spends one semester at Santa Clara Jesuit College intent on becoming a priest. Years later he writes that he left the school and the church because of their restrictive views on women and gays and because he read Stanford professor Yvor Winters’s essay on Wallace Stevens.
With financial help from his father, Commander Blaisdell, Gus is enrolled at Stanford University to study with Yvor Winters. Some friends and notable writers working under Winters in poetry or in Creative Writing under Wallace Stegner at this time were N. Scott Momaday, Thomas McGuane, Ernest Gaines, Ken Kesey, Thom Gunn, Frances McCullough, Larry McMurtry, Luis Harss, Robert Stone, and Wendell Berry, among others.
1955 Longtime San Diego friend Gina writes, “While at Stanford, I wore cashmere sweaters and white bucks. . . . I went to the symphony, the opera, and the “The Flicks,” but mostly I went to the library. Gus took me to a seedy little bar on Broadway to hear Dave Brubeck play, to a tiny Japanese restaurant in a dark basement somewhere, and to Foreign Movies with nudity and subtitles.”
A letter to Gus from Charles Mingus [New York] May 23, 1955:
“Dear Gus, Sorry I’m so long in answering your letter, but I have little enough time writing music, let alone letters!
“As far as telling you what I felt and feel about Bird, that’s almost impossible. I have never sorted out my thoughts enuf to put them down on paper. Most of what was commonly known about him has already appeared in the music magazines; the rest is mostly not for publication; and the main thing I had with Bird is too personal to try to tell about. As for music, he was just the biggest figure we’ve seen in the past 15 years and completely upset the music world. To enlarge on that I’m enclosing an article I wrote for a Paris Jazz magazine a couple of years ago–but it still fits, especially since the advent of Brubeck and jazzwestcoast. Incidentally, you should exclude Mulligan out of the category of Brubeck and Rogers– Gerry’s fresh and a creator.
“Sorry, I can’t be of more help but I’m hung up with this record company and getting ready to go on the road so I’m pretty busy. Incidentally, you ain’t heard nothing ’til you hear Thad’s [Thad Jones’] newest album. That’s it! And then, sometimes he even blow better–
“Later–best regards.
Chas”
1956 Sequoia, Stanford’s literary magazine, publishes a short story, “A-Talionis” by Gus Blaisdell, which begins, “This the Philosopher says: That a man should write one hour before he dies; even then it is too soon.”
1957 Gus graduates from Stanford with an English degree, philosophy minor. Anxious about his future, he gets engaged to Glennis George, a Stanford junior, “because he didn’t know what else to do since he was graduating,” he later wrote in third person; “All he knew was he didn’t want to make the army scene.”
After graduation, at which Herbert Hoover gave the commencement address and Gus wore sandals, he drives to Aspen, Colorado, where Glennis’s parents are wealthy socialites and where she and Gus marry in June. He writes that “Ivan Abrams and I arrived in Aspen. Ivan had quit his doctoral program in comparative literature at Stanford in 1956, saying that he’d rather wind up on the Bowery than teach.” Ivan eventually opens the Quadrant Bookstore in Aspen. Other friends of Gus’s in Aspen over the years range from philosopher Irving Thalberg (son of actress Norma Shearer and Hollywood mogul Irving, Sr.) to writer Hunter S. Thompson, physicist Sterling Colgate, silk-screen artist Thomas Benton, and restaurateur Herbie Balderson.
1958 In the fall Gus and Glennis (“pregnant with my draft excuse and my reason for deciding on being a C. O.”) return to Stanford. With a John Locke Tuition Scholarship in Philosophy Gus does doctoral work in philosophy with Arnold Isenberg in aesthetics, Donald Davidson in theory of meaning, Herbert Morris in philosophy of law, Montgomery Furth in epistemology, and Daniel Bennett in philosophy of action. “It was Bennett who introduced me to [Stanley] Cavell through ‘Must we mean what we say?’ 1957.” (Cavell had presented an early version of his essay at a Stanford symposium that year.)
Gus works as a research aide at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences. Gus had met Ken Kesey as an undergraduate on the Stanford wrestling team, and now became a regular visitor to Kesey’s house at 9 Perry Lane. Painter Robert Stark writes, “He loved to tell stories about him and Kesey being guinea pigs for mind-altering drug experiments for the military at Stanford. When I met Ken Kesey in Big Sur all Ken could talk about was Gus and what a wild and brilliant man he was.” Longtime Stanford friend and correspondent Nicholas Brownrigg writes, “When I first met [Gus] at Stanford after I got out of the Navy, he was a breath of reason, of sanity, and helped me. . . . He’d point out wonderful books, Max Frisch, Mann, the Germans, the French, and talked endlessly of them.” At this time Gus also meets classical guitarist, painter and sculptor, Joe Bacon; and the editor, writer, and Peter Handke translator, Michael Roloff.
1959 In his notebooks Gus makes several references to “encounters with the Ø’s [philosophers] at Kepler’s,” the renowned Menlo Park counterculture bookstore. Ira Sandperl, a Gandhi scholar, pacifist, and fixture at Kepler’s, said that Gus was quite charming and that he used to lend Gus books. (The under-the-counter lending of books from the bookstore shelves to needy and trustworthy friends would be a generosity that Gus would continue to provide in his own bookselling business, along with selling books to them at cost.)
In a letter to Joe Bacon, who had left Stanford, Gus writes about Philosophy department happenings:
“I am sad to say that, in general, the Quine lectures were very disappointing. . . . The last was a mess which both Kreisel and I found insane.
“After one of the lectures Kreisel, Quine, and I had a three-hour discussion on the problem of fictionals. I pointed out that it would be quite difficult to quantify statements such as ‘There are fictional characters!’, meaning by this that one could quantify them, i.e., put them into symbols, but that the problem of interpretation was another thing entirely. Quine liked that and we started to talk about what the values of the variables would be in such cases. Kreisel talked about fictional variables, drooled on his white shirt (open at the neck, of course), and ran his hand around in that hairpiece of his which, for all the world, reminds me of a moist and frazzled snatch! Quine’s a nice man; he’s also a good philosopher—or so I’m told—; but I’m not overly impressed. Another of my basic problems: I am hardly ever overly impressed. . . . I could only too well sympathize with you if you did not come back here. . . .”
Gus, Glennis and Brenna Blaisdell
Glennis graduates in June with a degree in Sociology and their daughter Brenna is born in July.
1960 Gus writes, “I was twenty-five, a graduate student making myself miserable by trying to find in positivism and mathematical logic something I might call philosophy.” He walks out on his preliminary exams. Back in Aspen his friend Irving Thalberg asks him, “Is there a distinction between reject and renounce?”
Gus is tormented by a desire to write. “‘Write, Write, Write! Motherfucker!’ a little wheedley voice kept chanting to me during the months preceding the exams,” he writes to Nick Brownrigg. “In the seasons of my self (soul) the time was out of joint–had been for years. . . . Am I penitent? Hardly. Just sort of blank, the world’s kaleidoscope whirling insignificantly by past the grid of my eye, me turning its spectre, to my ghost, sliding it up into memory’s tube.”
In July he writes, “We lost our little pad in Palo Alto…the garden held too many pitfalls for a lumbering and curious child…Me and Stanford? I believe we are quits, kaput.” And in an August letter he confesses an expanding emotional turmoil, his marriage is coming apart and he’s met and fallen for “a girl named Sally” in Denver.
During this difficult period Gus travels from Aspen to Denver to Washington, D.C. (where he reconnects with his father) and to New York (where he stays with John Benedict, a new editor at Norton; meets Anatole Broyard; and makes his first brief contact with Allen Ginsberg, James Baldwin, and others on the Greenwich Village scene); he journeys afterward to Mexico City, where Sally is spending a semester studying Spanish.
He writes to Nick Brownrigg, “On the day I was leaving NYC for Mexico I got a letter from Monty Furth that absolutely tore me limb from limb. His criticisms and ‘analyses’ of me were excellent, astute, and in a sort of brutal, backhanded fashion, ‘pleasant.’ All the way down to Mexico I sat in a sort of numb silence: I felt like the Medusa who’d seen her own reflection for the first time–I too was turned to stone.”
1961 Still unsettled, Gus decries “this horrible restlessness inside me;” he explains to Nick: “I wanted to go, to move–but not to wander aimlessly. I was writing and some of the stories are fine; Broyard is peddling them for me; and because I had ceased my Bartleby moods, I was happy that pen hit paper and things cooked away. But something was amiss. . . . I was sick shit of living what I unlovingly now refer to as a ‘first-draft existence.’ I wanted terribly to finish something. . . . So, chin in hot palm, I decided to return here [San Diego], get a job, write like a maniac, and finish my philosophy. I intend to take the exams this May. . . .”
In April he is in Denver with Sally and studying hard at mathematics; and in May he goes
back to Stanford. Again, he blows off the exams. He describes it to Nick:
“Now, about Gus. Palo Alto was, at the time of the exams, one of the worst periods I’ve ever been through. It was, I thought, a new beginning; but after a few days I realized it was the lees and dregs of the end of a little world. To preserve this world in some way, I screwed, turned on, etc. because these were ways of then preserving myself, my tenuous identity. The finishing one thing business was intellectualizing a need: viz, the realization that I was indifferent, that I wanted to care about exams and people, but that I did not or could not or would not. The chances were there, so probably all these are true. There was no drive, except destructive ones: and this came out in abominable fucks, bennies (taken to study), sleeping with a vengeance, and endless talking, running round, until at last I came up against the little grunting solipsist inside the outer man, failed the exams, realized my brutality, and split to the land of the lotus eaters, hoping to avoid the final apotheosis of Aspen but sinking deeper into it than I had ever been before. That was the bottom of the barrel, then everything I touched turned to shit. Guilt? Not really, because there is nothing that can be remade out to those times; just call it a gnaw in the conscience, a memory unfaded, that seems always bright, and with which I confront myself time and again.”
His first marriage ends.
During the summer and fall in Aspen he writes that he is attempting to finish a semi-autobiographical novel and concentrating on poetry with mixed results, while working odd jobs (including dishwasher, surveyor, and a short stint as unit manager and assistant to the director for a U.S.I.A. film crew doing a cultural documentary on Aspen).
Gus and Sally Blaisdell photo by Joe Bacon
1962 Gus and Sally (Nelson) marry in January in Aspen. He adopts her three year old daughter Shawn. Sally says, “The first night that I met Gus [in Denver in 1960] he took me to see the strip tease artist Tempest Storm. I don’t recall much about her but afterwards he drove me down to Larimer Street and recited Allen Ginsberg’s Howl.”
They move to Denver where Gus gets a job at Stanley Aviation with his friend photographer/engineer Arnold Gassan. Arnold arranges for the photographer Minor White to teach a one-week intensive photography workshop in Denver.
Gus writes to Nick Brownrigg, “I went to a lecture last night by an avant-garde photographer named Minor White, and it was one of the most fantastic experiences I have ever had in a public lecture. His photos, often terrifying in a revelationary way, were there for me–I looked at them and said yes, I’ve been there; or yes, it is still in me. . . . I spent most of last night with him talking and listening. He has a sequence of pictures called The Sound of One Hand–they will tear your head off. . . .”
According to Robert Stark, a workshop participant, Gus (who is just hanging out) is the most insightful and articulate critic of Minor’s work. Stark writes, “Jim Milmoe, later to become the editor of Aperture, also participated in that workshop. Minor White and Gus frequently got into heated discussions over Minor’s photographs. Gus would chide Minor over his involvement with mysticism and Gurdjieff.” In a letter to Minor White, Gus writes: “M., I want you to give me an exercise on the following puzzle. How can I stop taking my writing so deadly seriously, make it become less of a painful war between myself, the paper, the pen. . . . It is like strangling something or performing an appendectomy on oneself with a rusty sardine lid. . . . I feel like a crazy Jivaro shrinking his own confused head!” It is Minor White who encourages Gus to write in a journal every day, through all of his moods, which Gus does, for the next 41 years.
Arnold Gassan is also making short experimental films at this time which Gus collaborates on.
Gus is studying for a masters in mathematics at Denver University. “I have been out of work for a while, the job at Stanley ending in a lay-off. . . . The last week has been spent with mathematical hammer and tongs in hand, forging away at a set of differential equations that nobody knows a damned thing about.”
While looking for work with another Defense Department contract firm in Denver, Gus finds he’s been blacklisted. He writes to Nick: “I told you the government blacklisted me. They refuse to give me a security-clearance. . . . It is probably McCarthy’s ghost with his ‘ . . . we have it from a reliable source that . . .’ You feel a little proud, a little scared because you are debarred from the work you’ve chosen, and a little sad because a country like this one is running so damned scared.”
Proof Sheet portraits of Gus by Arnold Gassan, 1962
From another letter to Nick: “I just finished three days in Aspen. I met Jonathan Williams while there and he knew about me thru you and [Kenneth] Rexroth. He is charming, sharp, fun, etc.; and I also like his ‘companion’ Ron Johnson . . . a damned intelligent guy.”
In Denver Gus works part time as a contributing editor and distributor for the literary Alan Swallow Press, Yvor Winters’ publisher. He writes, “The last couple of weeks I’ve been reading Mss for Swallow. . . . Another poet I pray Alan will soon publish is named William Pillin. . . . His ms, Pavanne for a Fading Memory, . . . is one of the most accomplished and exciting books of verse I’ve read in years . . . doubly exciting in ms, the undiscovered poet, never collected in a big edition.” At one point Alan Swallow says of Gus to Sally, “All that education and brilliance and he is practically unemployable.” Alan refers Gus to a friend writing at the Denver Post.
Daughter Nicole is born in August.
1963 Gus becomes a freelance reviewer of books and films for the Denver Post; a Denver Exchange Booker (of films) and advertising copy editor for Metro Goldwyn Mayer; as well as a contributing editor to Author and Journalist, a new periodical published by Swallow. Gus writes three pieces for Author and Journalist that year: one on Alan Swallow, another on Ken Kesey, and an interview/essay on James Baldwin.
From a letter to Nick, “It is fucking hard to let others love you whether you return that affection or not. It is much easier to love other people in the secret depths of your soul. Like Mary after the annunciation–to ponder these things in your heart. Love? Jimmy Baldwin knows what love is, what it demands and what it takes away in reprisal. Listen to that soft voice, with its warmth and desire. It will break your heart, perhaps it will break a few national hearts.” Baldwin is touring the country on behalf of C.O.R.E. and Gus’s article/interview with him will be reprinted in the Negro Digest the following year.
Gus writes a Denver Post book review of The Blind written by his Stanford friend Luis Harss, the Chilean born, Argentine writer.
While reading manuscripts for Swallow Press (Frank Waters, Phil Reno, William Eastlake, and Leland C. Wyman) Gus becomes fascinated with anthropology, the Hopi, the Navaho, and New Mexico. He corresponds with William Burroughs in Tangiers at this time about comic books and Swallow possibly publishing Burroughs’ work.
Luc Alan Blaisdell is born in August.
Gus moves the family to Craig, Colorado to manage the West Theater.
1964 A correspondence with Navaho scholar Leland C. Wyman at Boston University begins. Wyman gives Gus information and readings on Navaho culture, shamanism, and religion, and also on the few PhD programs available in anthropology–one of which is at the University of New Mexico. Gus passes along information on Navaho Ways from Wyman to Burroughs. Burroughs mentions that while at Harvard he studied under Prof. Clyde Gluckhohn, a Navaho expert.
From Craig, Colorado Gus writes to Jonathan Williams, “I am heading down to NM to see [William] Eastlake, live in a Hogan with a big-shot singer called Billy Norton, and pick the brain of my friend Leland C. Wyman, last of the big-time big-shots to the Navaho.” In one letter Wyman asks Gus why all the interest in sex: “Your catechism last summer consisted almost entirely of the sexier side of Navaho-ology. How come?” Wyman later thanks Gus for his responding discourse on sex vs. pornography, vs. eroticism. Wyman says that he’s read it several times and hopes that eventually he will understand it all.
Gus decides to move the family to Albuquerque to study anthropology at the University of New Mexico, where earlier Sally had earned a degree in Latin American studies. Another draw is New Mexico’s literary climate (William Eastlake, Edward Abbey, and poet Robert Creeley are working there). Gus writes that on first meeting Creeley they drank all day, talked, argued, and then got into a fist fight.
After one semester at UNM, Gus abandons his anthropology studies.
1965 In a January letter to Joe Bacon he writes, “Well, withdrew from UNM, an enormous sense of relief. Had more than enough of pisspots, potshards and prehistoric arrow points. Then, my usual bad Karma rearing its ugly head, I was laid off till April when the drive-in theatres will supposedly reopen.” Gus was manager of Albuquerque’s Silver Dollar drive-in theater, but is desperate to find a better job to support his family.
Gus joins the University of New Mexico Press. Over time he works his way up from assistant editor to acquiring editor for scholarly books and co-editor of the New Mexico Quarterly, a literary journal published by UNM Press.
Correspondence begins with Evan Connell. Gus writes, “I want to do an extended article on your work. . . . I did the essay for Author and Journalist . . . but A&J immediately folded—perhaps on receiving another essay by me!”
Poems 1965 by Gus Blaisdell is published by Howard McCord’s Tribal Press.
1966 Gus publishes Luis Harss’s essays on Latin American writers (Juan Rulfo, Carlos Fuentes, and Julio Cortázar) in the New Mexico Quarterly, essays that will be included in Harss’s important book Into the Mainstream: Conversations with Latin American Writers.
“I met Luis at Stanford sometime in 1954, in a labyrinthian complex of clapboard barracks that had been a military hospital in WWII and were then used for student housing. I remember that the barracks were heated by steam: in summer they smelled of old wounds; in winter, of cold bandages and antiseptic…Luis, with his precise diction and incisive perceptions, was a single light in that otherwise acrid environment.”
Gus’s extended essay entitled “After Ground Zero” on Evan S. Connell’s work appears in the Summer issue of New Mexico Quarterly.
In November, while at UNM Press, Gus receives a telegram saying that his publishing mentor and friend, Alan Swallow, has died of a heart attack at his typewriter. Gus writes a short tribute, “Bio of a Swallow,” and publishes it in the Winter issue of New Mexico Quarterly along with Alan’s autobiographical essay, “Story of a Publisher.”
In a letter Gus writes, “I began commuting to Denver on weekends to help with running Swallow Press and it happened that my great teacher Yvor Winters’ last two books, Forms of Discovery and its companion anthology, Quest for Reality, were mine to design and edit.” In a letter to one of the lawyers during the chaos after Alan’s death, Winters writes that, “Gus Blaisdell undertook this job with no payment from the company and at considerable financial sacrifice to himself. He has done this out of admiration for Alan and myself and out of loyalty to Mae [Alan Swallow’s wife].” Gus also refused Winters’ offer of payment.
To Swallow’s wife Winters writes that “Alan was an odd genius. . . . He had a gift which is restricted usually to good poets: He could recognize good writing and recognize it at once (he recognized the same gift in Gus, and so do I). It was this that made him a success as a publisher, this plus the energy of three bull-mastiffs. He was almost ready to take Gus on, before he died, as a junior partner; but he had been a lone wolf for so long that he couldn’t bring himself to it.”
1967 To his poet friend and the publisher of Jargon, Jonathan Williams, Gus writes, “Things are hellish and hectic, the work of both presses really pressing in on me on all sides.” The pressure of events following Swallow’s death seems to trigger a manic streak in Gus’s behavior, escalating toward self-destruction. Good friend and Placitas poet, Bill Pearlman, writes about the time, “. . . it was our treasure, our folly, our unregenerative space-out. 1967. Files of breakdowns, overdoses, splendors. . . . Nobody could have predicted how it would go. We were able to feel the insurrection, the rebellion, and the [Vietnam] war was our nemesis. After [Robert] Kennedy’s murder, we were in a fit and nothing could stop us. . . . Allen Ginsberg gave a reading at UNM April 28, 1967 and it was a huge circus event. Afterward, we all [including Gus] went out to the Thunderbird [bar] in Placitas . . . [and] proceeded to the Lower Farm . . . the scene of a several day acid high. . . . We kicked up the dust, did several scenes from King Lear and pitched 40 pound boulders into the nearby arroyo. [Ginsberg] had arrived in New Mexico from LA . . . with 100 hits of Owsley acid, Purple Domes and White Lightning.”
The Albuquerque vice squad arrests Phil Mayne, the owner of The Grasshopper Bookstore that Gus frequents, for carrying “obscene material” (Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer and William Burroughs’ Naked Lunch, among others).
In a June letter to Winters, dealing with final publishing details for Forms of Discovery, Gus writes, “From July 18 – 23 I’ll be in Aspen, Colorado, as a delegate to the International Design Conference.” In August Gus becomes a consultant during the difficult transition from Alan Swallow Press of Denver to Swallow Press, Inc. of Chicago, while still working at UNM Press.
N. Scott Momaday’s parents leave a copy of The Journey of Tai-Me (The Way to Rainy Mountain) for Gus to read. Gus has to fight hard and creatively for two years to get it published. While at UNM Press Gus aids in the recognition of Native American writers, publishing N. Scott Momaday, Leslie Marmon Silko, and Simon Ortiz in the New Mexico Quarterly.
Four of Gus’s poems are included in Drum Book, published by Howard McCord’s Tribal Press.
Daughter Casey Noel Blaisdell is born in December.
1968 In January Yvor Winters dies. In April Gus stops drinking for a month.
In Gus’s “Holygraph” (a blank dummy book–holograph–for the Winters Forms of Discovery run) Scott Momaday writes,
“Dear Veering,
It has been good to be
with you on the way to Rainy
Mountain. One day you must
go to the cemetery there, to
see the gravestones of some of
these red people you must at
times feel that you know.
And I hope that the
weather is particularly hard
on that occasion.
N. Scott Momaday
Christmas Eve 1968”
Gus writes in a journal:
“On an Inscription in my Holygraph Book
for Scott.
We have been to/get/her now these many months
each on his way to Rainy Mountain, a journey
taken in fact, in spirit, and imagination.
It is a labor of love without loss, finding
my way, finally, to that dark stone
that bears your grandmother’s name.
You wish me the hardest weather on my visit
Such weather is the weather of my spirit,
A semiarid terrain wild with winds, and,
At evening, reason’s rage and fury flaming,
When the wind blows and wind bells ring
Or the snow falls down and no bell rings.”
Still frustrated by the lack of an advanced degree, Gus enrolls in graduate school at UNM to study philosophy and mathematics. In a letter to friend and Tribal Press publisher, Howard McCord, Gus writes,
“Sitting around these mad rationalists and poets is telling. Descartes raps, and Leibniz and Spinoza rap back; I rap on all three; Wittgenstein jumps up and down, tearing his fuzzy fright wig; and Sam “The Sham”–as in sham-an–Beckett smiles from the mouth of the jug in which he is immersed.
“Now if the above should seem hyperbolic and oblique, it simply hyperbolically and obliquely–with some metaphor–states that I have begun my dissertation this summer. Consolation; if I survive intact, it will drive the department out of their zonks. Title: PRIVACY: FACT & FICTION, and dealing with self-knowledge and “inner experience”–cf.: “Gloss Annexed” and the preceding, “side window.” Philosophers: Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Wittgenstein, & Strawson; real philosophers–though some would maintain philosophes–Beckett, Borges, Cunningham (Quest of the Opal), Connell (Notes), Valery (mostly M. Teste), Mallarmé (the criticism and theory, with a few poems [thrown in]), etc. As my friend and mentor Monty Furth says—Narrow the fucking thing or title it THE WORLD.”
In a November letter to Durrett Wagner of Swallow Press, Chicago Gus writes, “Sluggishness–would that it were so; I’m just overloaded, over-reached, and nearing over-exhaustion.”
In December the basement of Gus and Sally’s house catches fire. Much is lost.
1969 In January Gus writes to Janet Lewis, “He [Scott Momaday] is pleased with Rainy Mountain, which is in page proof, the illustrations keyed in. Ken [Fields] wrote a wonderful two pages on the book, and from the small consensus of distinguished gentlemen at hand I am certain that the book is, will become, a classic. Scott is writing a “gloss” on the special imagination involved in Rainy Mountain for the next issue of NMQ, a special double issue on the contemporary American imagination.” In a postcard Momaday writes to Gus that the cloth, the jacket, Janet Lewis’s statement, everything is “smashing” and that he couldn’t be more pleased.
Gus leaves UNM Press by mutual agreement shortly thereafter.
Gus spends the summer of ’69 in San Francisco, visiting with Evan Connell and Ernie Gaines. He writes that he’s working for Ferlinghetti at City Lights Publishing, cataloging his private collection and starting editing on Neal Cassady’s, Last Third. He meets Peter Howard, owner of Serendipity Books, and Jack Shoemaker, who is working there.
Gus writes to his Stanford friend, the Argentine writer Luis Harss:
“I spent the summer in San Francisco, doing free-lance editorial work for Ferlinghetti at City Lights Publishing and studying typography with my friend Jack Warner Stauffacher. It was a successful summer in the sense that I was alone, “dropped out” as the phrasing has it today, and I pretty well systematically (and otherwise) deranged my senses on booze, mushrooms, acid, pot and anything else that I could ingest or insert. Dereglement des sens. Yeah, thanks Rimbaud.
“Anyway, returned, I am now on the wagon and off cigarettes—the last for over a year now. I discovered that I was using booze as a “downer,” a tranquilizer, and I decided that I would simply live with my high-energy freakiness or let the whole thing slide. I now find that—unmystically!—I exist in a kind of metabolic high, thereby forming an ecosphere that scares shit out of most of the people who come within its frontiers and boundaries (which is which depends on the side of the line you are on).”
Gus’s semi-autobiographical story entitled “A Gloss Annexed” is published in the Summer issue of Café Solo under “Theory,” edited by Glenna Luschei.
Gus’s short story “Spaces” is published in New Mexico Quarterly’s, final issue, The Contemporary Imagination, edited by Gene Frumkin with help from Gus. Sur, the Argentine literary magazine, translates NMQ’s final issue into Spanish.
Gus is selected as one of eight panel members for the Discovery Writers program of the National Endowment for the Arts.
1970 NEA Grants are awarded to Gus’s nominees Leslie Chapman (Marmon Silko), Ronald Johnson, Simon Ortiz, James Welch, and Geoffrey Young. Later in an advance review copy of her landmark book Ceremony Leslie Marmon Silko writes, “For Gus, / The one who kept me / going at a time when / I almost became a / lawyer instead. / I won’t forget, / Love, / Leslie.” The grant allowed her to quit law school and write Ceremony.
On the recommendation of journalist Tony Hillerman New Mexico Tech’s president, Sterling Colgate, hires Gus as a P R man in Information Services. Gus writes to Bill Pearlman:
“Well, what can I tell you about the delights of Socorro? That there are tribes of phenomenologists massing in a secret staging area in the hills? That the main recreation is driving up and down the main street, which is less than a mile long? There is a palace that shows flickers, and that is a saving grace. There are also a few possible human beings on the staff–like the drama cat who is doing Godot next weekend; one shrink; a couple of leering, lemurian mathematicians; and some other oddments in astrophysics… Socorro is a cry for help! But one can “work” in this ecosphere—there’s nothing else to do.”
Grasshopper Books on Central Avenue Owner Phil Mayne at Grasshopper Books
Peter ‘Poncho’ Elliston and Mike Elliston buy Phil Mayne’s Grasshopper Bookstore and turn it into the Living Batch Bookstore (its name taken from “The Gunslinger” by Edward Dorn, a poem about desperados bringing enlightenment to Albuquerque in the form of an acid-filled corpse–a work that Gus loathed). Already a Grasshopper veteran, Gus becomes a Batch regular, and Poncho says that they quickly discover Gus is sorely lacking in “customer relations.”
1971 Stanley Cavell’s The World Viewed is published. Gus wears a green army fatigue jacket and carries the tattered book everywhere, especially to Okie Joe’s Bar across from the University of New Mexico, a counterculture hub. The poet Gene Frumkin dedicates his poem, “The Intellectuals at Okie’s Bar,” to Gus.
Gus is enrolled at UNM in the doctoral program in mathematics. Sally is hired to do bookkeeping at the Living Batch Bookstore and is the only employee allowed to buy shares in the store.
With poet Larry Goddell Gus edits Fervent Valley #1, a small-press poetry magazine out of Placitas, New Mexico. Gus meets Felice Gonzales in the fall.
In September he becomes a lecturer in mathematics, English, and philosophy at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro. Gus hitchhikes the 70 miles between Socorro and Albuquerque, sleeping in his office two nights a week.
To his longtime friend and Stanford roommate, Ray Waddington, Gus writes, “I am back teaching–3 philosophy courses, 2 mathematics, and the latter is fun. I find myself gyring more and more into the helices of purity and farther and farther from Yeats’s tower. . . . I spent May through mid-July in California as a participant in an international symposium for Alfred Tarski (foundations of math).”
Gus is an invited speaker for the Visiting Lecture Series at The Claremont Colleges, Pomona, where Hap Tivey, James Turrell, Lewis Baltz, and Marcy Goodwin are graduate students, Guy Williams is teaching art, and Mowry Baden is the chair of the Art Department.
Photo caption: “At the time they were all determined to become mightily famous, and the amazing thing is that for the most part, they did. They achieved their goals and then some. So the photo was meant to document the coming together of these to-be-mighty artists–top left is Hap Tivey, Jim Turrell, Gus, Duke [Lewis Baltz]. In the front is Mowry Baden on the left, and Guy [Williams] on the right.” –from friend and museum consultant, Marcy Goodwin.
1972 Sally and Gus divorce in January.
While living with Felice Gonzales, Gus stops drinking in the fall.
1973 Gus’s correspondence with photographer Lewis (Duke) Baltz begins.
Photograph by Lewis Baltz
In a letter from Jonathan Williams to Gus on writing and rejection from publishers, “I suppose all one can do is persist and master seduction through good letters.” Gus is a visiting artist and lecturer at Bowling Green State University, Ohio. In a letter to friend and poet Geoff Young Gus writes, “I completely stopped drinking about two months ago. Like when I quit smoking, this seems to be the real thing: I have no desire for the sauce. The new energy level is amazing and appalling. . . .”
1974 Gus’s Fractionally Awake Monad, dedicated to Montgomery Furth, is published by Sand Dollar Press (publisher Jack Shoemaker’s first press imprint).
Howard McCord’s Tribal Press publishes Gus’s essay/prose/poem, O Bateau (standing for the Bar At the End of the World, with a nod to Rimbaud) in Measure 6/7, a small press magazine. In the last stanza/paragraph of O Bateau Gus writes,
“In the back room sits a poet who no longer writes. He just junks and drinks, the rhythmic lines now only bubbling in his veins, eating through his forehead, and idling numbly up from his dimming backbrain. One more seeking life like art, an intensity that burns and wrinkles, all muscles in the acetylene of alcohol. Ghosts whisper in him. But it is too late for him even to recognize the voices of those he still loves and of those who still love him. Upon the heaving bodies of women and the lips of glasses and the necks of bottles and the backs of his decaying teeth he inscribes his final poems. In gibberish, O Bateau.”
Gus writes to Howard McCord that he has a studio in Aspen for July. For the Aspen Times Gus covers the International Design Conference in Aspen (IDCA) writing about the main speakers Bobby Seale, Susan Sontag, and John Berger as well as fame, language, photography, film, society and Aspen. From June 24-26 Gus attends the Cornell Seminar on Science, Technology and Society in Aspen. He writes, “It was deadly. I am about completely resolved to get out of academe. There was another guy in the seminar, David Braybrooke, from Nova Scotia, who was a ringer for [Montgomery] Furth–Oxford trained, analytical philosopher. . . . We talked about philosophy, this and that; I gave him a lengthy piece of mine, ‘The Color of Wisdom’ (Augustine: Quem colorem habent sapientia?), contra academic philosophy; and he liked it.”
1975 Gus’s mother Mary dies in February.
Prose Ocean by Gus, with illustrations by Chuck Miller, is published by Bear Hug Books, distributed by Serendipity Books in Berkeley.
In a letter to Ray Waddington about the settlement of his tenure lawsuit at New Mexico Tech Gus writes, “The academic shit is no hassle; I’ve been wanting to get out, unbeknownst to them, but now I must leave in tact and with a foundation for the guys behind me. . . .”
Ray Waddington and Gus
1976 Tribal Press publishes Gus’s book of poems Dented Fenders 1960-1975.
Gus reviews the Collected Essaysof J. V. Cunningham for Pacific Sun Review.
His essay “Building Poems” on poet Ronald Johnson is published in Vort.
Both Gus’s father and stepfather die in 1976 within a month of each other. Gus attends his stepfather Jim Casey’s funeral. His father Norman is buried in Arlington National Cemetery. Gus inherits enough money to buy his house on Hermosa Street near the university and focus on writing, researching, teaching, and publishing.
Through an agreement with Poncho Elliston, Gus becomes owner of the Living Batch Bookstore, “an alternative to an absence” in the Southwest and a place for his friends to come and read, including Edward Abbey, Allen Ginsberg, Robert Creeley, Stanley Cavell, Stanley Crawford and many more. In a newspaper article about the store Gus says, “It was an alternative to an absence. When we started there was no gay, no women, no politics, no black, no small press, no serious literature in the state. Maybe you could find the books at my place you couldn’t find anyplace else.”
He begins teaching part-time at the University of New Mexico as a lecturer in the College of Fine Arts. In December his invited address to the Poetry Division of the Modern Language Association in New York City is titled, “Philosophy’s Poet, The Skeptic.”
Gus becomes a contributing editor to Artspace, a new journal of contemporary art founded by William Peterson; the premier issue in the fall carries his essay, “Larry Goodell: Co(s)mic Clown.” For the next 17 years Artspace will provide a steady outlet for Gus’s writing.
1977 His first essay on Lewis Baltz, “BLDGS,” is published in the catalog for Three Photographic Visions, an exhibition curated by Arnold Gassan at Trisolini Gallery in Athens, Ohio and the Dayton Art Institute.
Gus inherits his mother’s house and moves Sally and the kids to San Diego.
1978 The New Mexico Arts Division’s “Poetry in the Schools” program gives Gus an award to teach in the Santa Fe Public Schools.
“A Nobler Seduction” by Gus is included in Jack Staffaucher’s Greenwood Press monograph of Plato’s Phaedrus:A Search for the Typographic Form of Plato’s Phaedrus. In a review of the monograph Gus writes:
“The real achievement of Jack’s most successful pages is a beauty noticed only on reflection: as if present first to the mind, the eye is reminded to look once again, and it suddenly sees anew, or for the very first time. This would have been a beauty close to Socrates’ heart and to his vision of truth’s nonluminous, almost beggarly plainness. The fact that one must reflect in order to capture the beauties of pages designed to be effortlessly readable is itself a Platonic notion, since it is through memory that the philosopher is enabled to maintain himself ‘always perfectly initiated into perfect mysteries’; and it is through such earthly beauty that he is recalled to his initial glimpses of true being.”
Gus and Felice Gonzales marry.
1979 Gus is a National Endowment for the Arts Literature Fellowship recipient. His essay on concrete poetry titled, “Viz., Poetry” is published in New Mexico Studies in the Fine Arts.
Through Artspace, Gus and Lewis Baltz receive a National Endowment for the Arts grant for Park City. The collaborative project quickly outgrows the scope of the NEA grant and Baltz’s New York dealer, Leo Castelli, steps in to finance its completion.
1980 Gus is a literary consultant for his friend Jack Shoemaker at North Point Press, San Francisco, from its inception until its closing. He agents and edits many books including Saint Augustine’s Pigeon by Evan Connell. To Geoff Young, he writes, “Best novel in ms, William [S.] Wilson’s Birthplace, astonishingly original, what one would hope for, expect, and then more. . . . I want to get it to North Point”
Park City with photographs by Lewis Baltz and Gus Blaisdell’s essay “Skeptical Landscapes” is published by Artspace Press and Castelli Graphics in cooperation with Aperture.
1982 Park City launches Gus on a whirlwind lecturing tour: Symposium Uber Photographia IV, Graz, Austria; Werkstadt fur Fotographie, Berlin; Oakland Art Museum, “Formal Issues in Recent Photographs;” University of California, Davis, “Eleven Contemporary Photographers;” New Topographics panel (Lewis Baltz, Gus Blaisdell, Joe Deal, Henry Wessel Jr.), Institute of Contemporary Art, University of Pennsylvania.
Gus and Felice divorce.
Living Batchbookstore moving day from Central Ave across the parking lot to their new home on Cornell
Gus’s monograph Guy Williams: Recent Paintings is published to accompany the painter’s solo exhibition at the Los Angeles Municipal Art Gallery.
Monograph by Gus Blaisdell
Academic roadblocks occur throughout Gus’s teaching. In 1982, Sam B. Girgus, the Chair of American Studies at UNM, writes a letter, as do others, attesting to his capabilities:
“Every university gathers around itself people of outstanding intellectual and creative qualities who lack the conventional certification that is usually required for advanced or graduate instruction. Such a person is Gus Blaisdell. I met Gus Blaisdell my first day on campus as a professor when Joel Jones introduced me to him on the grounds that Gus was an invaluable and impeccable source of new ideas and important intellectual trends. Since that time I have discovered that he serves a similar function for countless members of this academic community. He has taught innumerable courses for the university through many different departments and programs. He has an outstanding reputation among the faculty for the depth and range of his learning and erudition and for his critical brilliance.”
1984 In an Albuquerque Journal article Gus says that education is the biggest investment the state has, but New Mexico has yet to recognize that fact. “Education is radical because it keeps democracy alive,” he said. “As soon as you reach a certain level of ignorance, democracy has had it. The system is pretty flabby now.”
Gus works as a volunteer teacher at Freedom High School and volunteers at the Albuquerque Mediation Center in addition to teaching at UNM.
Bill Pearlman, Gus Blaisdell and Stanley Cavell at the Living Batch bookstore
1985 Gus goes to study at Harvard with Stanley Cavell. He and Janet sublet the Boston-area house of their anthropologist friends Dennis and Barbara Tedlock. On his return home after six months in Cambridge, he writes to Stanley, “Beloved friend . . . Coming home I have never more deeply and profoundly loved the empty, dimensionless vastness of the West. I am indeed a Westerner. The sky was empty blue and had no end, the mountains accidents of horizon, and it went up so clearly and so infinitely that as you looked at it you had trouble remembering that it was in front of your eyes and not the color of consciousness itself, a blue suffusion of mind.”
Gus and Janet are married in a Zen ceremony conducted by poet Philip Whalen.
1986 Gus is invited to speak about his and Lewis Baltz’s collaboration on Park City and other projects at the Fall Conference South-Central Region of the Society for Photographic Education hosted by the University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
1987 In Aspen Gus speaks about friendship at Irving Thalberg’s memorial service. “There are remarkable friendships. Their depths and faith do not require confined presence. Years may intervene before we see one another again but on being together it was only yesterday and we resume a conversation suspended or unfinished or barely begun generations ago. Such friendships are trepanation for death, as is philosophy when it comes to its senses. Death is final, one conversant is gone, an irrevocable interruption.”
1988 Gus sends his friend Stanley Crawford’s memoir Mayordomo to UNM Press, where it is published and wins a Western States Book Award. He reissues Crawford’s 1977 novel The Log of the SS. Mrs. Unguentine, the first under his Living Batch imprint. From the bookstore’s newsletter, Living Batch News:
Gus and Stanley Crawford
“LIVING BATCH ENTERS PUBLISHING . . . The first two [books] are Stanley Cavell’s This New Yet Unapproachable America and Stanley Crawford’s classic and long-unattainable The Log of the S.S. Mrs. Unguentine. Reasons for the press? To make some of what we believe in available and to produce at reasonable prices and in typographically handsome (readable) formats lost (and original) books of lasting interest. A simpler reason is enthusiasm. When I read Cavell’s lectures on Wittgenstein as a cultural philosopher and Emerson as finding and beginning the founding of American culture, I felt that if I ever wanted to publish, here was an opportunity not to be missed. For years I have tried to interest publishers in printing Crawford’s novel. . . . With Cavell as foundation and Crawford as the first couple of bricks I had more than I needed to move on. I trust such conviction will continue and the little wall of books will stretch like a new course of masonry, brick by brick, book by book, until we have a foot or so of our own choosing on our and others’ shelves.”
Gus and Janet divorce.
Gus helps Ira Jaffe to bring important speakers for the International Cinema Lecture Series at UNM, including Dusan Makavejev, Tony Bill, Robert Gardner, Ross McElwee, Kaja Silverman, Stan Brakhage, Walter Murch, Marianne Keane, and others.
1989 Gus writes his essay “Afterworld” for photographer Joel-Peter Witkin’s book,
Gods of Earth and Heaven.
Gus’s essay “Space begins because we look away from where we are” for Lewis Baltz’s book Candlestick Point is printed in both English and Japanese.
1991 Living Batch Press publishes poet Gene Frumkin’s Comma in the Ear.
Rule without Exception, the catalog for Lewis Baltz’s retrospective at the Des Moines Art Center and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, contains Gus’s essays “Still Moving” and “Space begins because we look away from where we are.”
1992 On Martin Luther King’s birthday Gus marries his last wife, Elizabeth Major, a prosecuting attorney, outstanding cook, and pianist.
Gus is the acting chair of the Media Arts Department at UNM filling in for his friend Ira Jaffe. In a letter to Robert Creeley he writes, “I’m chair of film for the year, Ira on a much needed sabbatical. The dean said I needn’t attend chairs’ and directors’ meetings, a weekly waste of 4 hours every Monday. Why, I asked. ‘Your impatience and candor are well known.’ ‘But if I have something?’ Then I’ll put you first on the agenda.’ . . . As it used to ‘pay to be ignorant,’ it now pays to be bad.”
Goodbye Matilija by poet Alan Stephens is published by Gus’s Living Batch Press with graphic design by Jeff Bryan, Batch employee and friend.
1993 Gus reprints Vampire Tapestry by Suzy Charnas in a “handsome trade paperback edition,” according to Charnas. Gus’s friend, the artist Joyce Kozloff, creates the cover and chapter illustrations for the book. It is the first book to make a “fine” profit for the press. Living Batch Press also reprints The Aficionado’s Southwestern Cookbook by poet Ronald Johnson (originally published at Gus’s suggestion by UNM Press in 1970).
In June he gives a talk on Yvor Winters and Harte Crane at the Poetry Conference at the University of Maine, Oronon.
1995 North Point’s The Collected Stories of Evan Connell is dedicated to Gus. In an interview Gus says, “A new image of man–I think that’s exactly what Evan is up to. There is too much humor merely to be blackly prophetic. Humor is the form hope takes. He’s not just pissing anger. He doesn’t belittle, though he may chide and scold. We reform ourselves out of what we already are.”
1996 Gus gives a rousing lecture/performance on the Beat poets at UNM’s Art Museum.
Living Batch Press publishes ARK by Ronald Johnson. Gus calls it, “The work of a lifetime.” On the back cover of ARK Robert Creeley writes, “Twenty years in the making, Ronald Johnson’s ARK is a defining, proposing and securing work of singular beauty and resolution. It takes its legitimate place with the great works of the century of like kind, Ezra Pound’s Cantos, Louis Zukofsky’s ‘A’, Charles Olson’s Maximus and Robert Duncan’s Passages. Its own specific character is, however, brilliantly singular.”
Robert Creeley gives the last invited reading at the Living Batch Bookstore.
In a December article on the closing of the Living Batch bookstore Gus says that “a literary period of mass readership for the small bookstore is passing out of democratic politics. I think inexpensive books should be available to a large number of people, if they want to read. So, through various circumstances, we have become extinct.”
1997 In January daughter Nicole follows Gus around the empty bookstore with her video camera, shooting footage for her video documentary portrait, His Heaviness. As he looks around the desolate bookstore Gus says:
“I don’t like what publishing has become. What we’ve seen progressively here is that the kind of material that we sell doesn’t sell to younger readers because the prices are so high—and the publishers won’t give you an economic break, they want everything in 30 days—but they also want you to build up a back list which you can’t do in 30 days.
“So politically I really object to the younger reader being priced out of the market. The book has become a luxury object wrapped up in indecipherable images…it belongs to the boomers and the yuppies, that’s not universally true but that’s sort of what the big machine maintained inventories are all about. There’s no difference really between a Barnes and Noble and a Price Club (Costco). They are all these huge temples to commodities…pyramids built around commodities and not around the dead…And the tradeoff for that is that if a machine maintains your inventory that means the human being can forget about it—so you get Mac clerks who are just selling Mac books.”
Away from the Road by poet Alan Stevens is the first publication under Gus’s new imprint, drive he sd books.
Gus Blaisdell at Jack Stauffacher’s Greenwood Press – San Francisco
1998 Gus writes “A Vigorous Lucidity” for Jack Stauffacher’s book, A Typographic Journey: The History of the Greenwood Press. A note before the essay reads, “My friendship with Gus Blasidell began in the early sixties when I returned to San Francisco to reestablish the press. When I was working on Phaedrus, he helped me in so many ways with the Supplement, writing a short essay titled, ‘A Nobler Seduction.’” Gus’s biographical note at the end reads, “Gus Blaisdell closed the Living Batch Bookstore in Albuquerque after twenty-seven years. He continues its spirit with the Living Batch Press, a small press soon to be renamed drive he sd press in honor of Creeley’s poem ‘I Know a Man.’ He teaches film studies at the University of New Mexico.”
1999 From Gus’s computer: “28 Sept. 5:09 AM: Unannounced episode beginning at 6:30 yesterday 9/27. Hand much worse, shoulder numb and right pectoral too. Rt hand barely works to type this. Speech slurred too but that seems to have passed. On walk last evening, 7:00, aura moiré in right eye for unusual 20 min. Slight numbness right ear. A little sweaty, but can’t tell if that is part or not. So head, ear, down to right pect and arm and hand much worse.”
Gus Blaisdell and Clark Coolidge
Now It’s Jazz by Clark Coolidge and Cerulean Embankments by Geoffrey Young are published by Gus under his drive he sd books imprint.
2000 For Robert Creeley’s reading at The Outpost performance space Gus publishes a chapbook of Creeley’s poems entitled For Friends, the last for Gus’s drive he sd books imprint.
Robert Creeley and Gus Blaisdell
For photographer John Gossage’s portfolio Hey Fuckface! Gus writes the accompanying pamphlet “From ‘Obscenity in Thy Mother’s Milk.”’
In November Gus is an invited speaker at the Yvor Winters Centenary Symposium at Stanford University, organized by poet and longtime friend Kenneth Fields, along with Thom Gunn, Donald Hall, Helen Pinkerton, Ann Hayes, Dana Gioia, R. L. Barth, and others.
Gus Blaisdell at Stanford photo by Ken Fields
Comedian Marc Maron (WTF) pays tribute to Gus in an email titled, “acknowledge thy guru”:
“Buddha–
“Summer break, 1982. I walk into the Batch. There is a poster up for a beatnik
Summit at Naropa. I’m filled with excitement and ready to borrow my Dad’s Mercedes to drive up and live it. Then, the Wizard of Lizard City speaks,
“‘Why do you want to go up there and see those geriatrics? I met Kerouac. He was drunk and babbling. Live like a tree, Neal.’
“If it hadn’t been for that moment of perspective I might have spent my college years selling Dead bootlegs in arena parking lots.
“. . . No worries, Obi Wan! The riff seeds you planted have spread rhizome style throughout my consciousness. . . . You are etched in the credits of my soul.”
Gus Blaisdell and Marc Maron at the Living Batch Bookstore
2001 His essay “Black Lacquer Bucket” on friend and artist Allan Graham is published in the book Toadhouse / Allan Graham by the Tucson Museum of Art.
Gus Blaisdell and Allen Graham at SITE Santa Fe
The traveling exhibition, “In Company: Robert Creeley’s Collaborations” comes to the UNM Art Museum. The assistant director asks Creeley if they could film him walking around discussing the work. Creeley agrees, but only if Gus can accompany him. He wanted someone who really understood his work.
2002 Gus writes, “Thirteen Ways of NOT Looking at a Gossage” for John Gossage’s book The Romance Industry.
2003 Gus interviews the artist Constance De Jong for her book Metal, published by UNM Press. In May Gus and Elizabeth travel to Italy, for Gossage art opening, art and adventure. On their way home they visit dear artist friends in New York.
Gus Blaisdell by photographer John Gossage
On September 17, a clear starry night, after lecturing on the Japanese film Pages of Madness (1926), Gus succumbs to a heart attack in the parking lot behind the Frontier Restaurant, a spot in the alleyway that perfectly intersects with the back of his old Living Batch Bookstore. Midwife Carol Brightwater, pulling out of the parking lot, notices people standing around. She sees someone on the ground, jumps out of her car and says, “What are you people doing?” With her brother’s help she administers CPR but finds no pulse. She says, “I’m not sure how long he was lying there, a few people were milling around at the edges uncertainly. I believe they were unable to go to him because of the strength of his presence, but because I deal with helping bring life into this world, and sometimes out of it, I was able to go to him. I could sense this great presence and I felt that my brother and I were meant to be there to help with his transition.”
The last entry in his notebook that day is a poem begun about two types of horses in Japanese prints–the Samurai’s horse and the pack horse.
The Death That Capsizes All Reproach
For Gus
Saw his mute overthrow as a sign there would be difficulties at the edge of time. Just when things looked auspicious, his heart attacked and the whole system went south. I would have loved to find him new rhythm, juice his stride for another ten years. But no such luck. The inevitable flat-on-the-back figure in hospital, looking peaceful, displacing who in fact is departed; the great word machine adjourned, the great vocal capability not even whispering one final valediction.
–Bill Pearlman
On September 23, in the UNM Alumni chapel, designed by John Gaw Meem, a friend of Yvor Winters, Gus’s memorial service overflowed with friends, family, four of his five wives, and his stalker. When the last speaker, his widow Elizabeth, finished, Bob Dylan’s Knockin on Heaven’s Door began.As the mourners stood to leave the Rolling Stones’ Sympathy for the Devil filled the chapel, along with tears, and the crowd moved reluctantly out into the waning light.
2004 Photographer John Gossage’s dedicates his monumental book, Berlin in the Time of the Wall, to Gus.
In Company: an Anthology of New Mexico Poets after 1960 published by UNM Press includes four of Gus’s poems, among them an untitled poem:
In my hand a smooth black stone. Still wet and cold
In my staring eyes, so still, the winter sea
A postcard from photographer Lewis Baltz to artist poet Geoff Young:
“Dear Geoff, Just returned from Paris to find your ‘O Hermie, O Augie’ [an edited collection of letters between Geoff and Gus] waiting for me. I’ve never properly mourned Gus because I’ve never really believed that he is dead. I’m perfectly prepared to accept the Death of God, even the Death of Art, but the Death of Gus is inconceivable. Hearing his voice–loud and clear–in ‘O Hermie’ reconfirms my belief that Gus is immortal and eternal. –Duke.”
In the end, let Gus have the last word:
“I was walking in the hills the other night. It was clear, the moon down, and hosts of stars were clearly visible. I thought of that letter from the young meteorologist to his beloved from Stalingrad–the one which ends that though he thought in light years he always felt in seconds. As I mused I wished that I knew more astronomy, that I could with ease identify galaxies, constellations, and nebulas. To do this, I suddenly realized, I would have to consult books, would have to turn my face from the sky to the page in order to gain a knowledge that would both enhance and transcend my simple seeing. I saw a triangulation: me, a book, and the starry skies. Yes, Mallarmé, all the world is there simply to be put into a book. But the books are there so that the world may be returned to its proper place. And in translation what is it that we leave behind?”
Gus Blaisdell’s writing studio photograph by Nicole Blaisdell Ivey
Finally, in the way of ” I’m finally getting a moment when I can
think”. I am awash with details for my next book “Berlin in the time of
the Wall”. I designed the book as well as made the photographs, so
every printing detail falls on me. It is something I’ve done before and
should expect, but it’s always something new ( ei. the slipcase won’t
hold the book correctly, since the book weights nine pounds and the
slipcase falls apart under that weight). But so much for complaints
about silly details. Thank you so much for the pictures of Gus and the
information about the service. I’m not a comfortable writer, as with
many photographers, but I would love to keep in touch with you…
… I have included the text for the Berlin book by Gerry Badger as
attachments to this since he quotes your dad a fair amount. I thought
some of it you might find of interest, as well as by sending it, it
makes me feel like I’ve sent you a long e-mail. Read what you find
interesting and forget the rest. A book will be in the mail by the end
of the year.
All my Best,
John
John Gossage
BLAISDELL, VOR DIE BERLINER MAUER — photograph by Lewis Baltz
Thirteen Ways of NOT Looking at a Gossage
in memory of Arnold Gassan
To use a horse to show that a horse is not a horse is not as good as
using a non-horse to show that a horse is not a horse.
–Chuang Tzu
John Gossage has asked me to write a few words about what his photographs are not. I have been in love with the negative since childhood. But what a photograph is not? Not identical with its subject; not a likeness of its subject; not a representation but a projection, because the original, as Cavell says, is as present as it ever was. In a photograph we see what is not present, the subject transformed in the medium of visible absence.
I particularly love negation used to isolate what a thing is, like the theologians’ via negativa. Attributes are taken away till the thing sought stands naked before you. Slightly obscene this long undressing of concepts and objects, it is like clearing out a bunch of weeds to get to a bare place. Gossage is seldom about clearing out. His photographs are often about a weedy and wasted jouissance. Whenever I look at a Gossage photograph one stanza from Wallace Stevens’ “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” comes to mind, the seventh:
O thin men of Haddam,
Why do you imagine golden birds?
Do you not see how the blackbird
Walks around the feet
Of the women about you?
Gossage is always about the luxuriance of what goes unnoticed, what goes unseen until his pictures call your attention to it. Stevens’ men of Haddam have grown thin imagining golden birds when at the feet of the women all around them they do not see either the blackbird walking or the women.
An exercise in subtraction. I will form pseudo-propositions with parentheses, negate them, and at the end, after the parens are closed, I attach the name of a major predecessor or contemporary of Gossage’s, artists with whom he shares a similarity but an even deeper difference.
NOT (atmospheric erosion like lichen clocks the head of Pan at Versailles; autumn leaves fallen on steps that descend semi-circularly to a circular landing and then continue their descent; the archaeology of streets and buildings presented after a terminal moraine has melted): Eugene Atget.
NOT (the American commonplace so quietly essential as to seem beyond the ability of photography or any other medium to capture, within the reach of nothing but admiration): Walker Evans.
NOT (the drama of the hard travellin’ road after Whitman and Kerouac, in outsider eyes where the lights are always going down, leaving only the ghostlighted stage of the photograph): Robert Frank.
NOT (still going on down, even Beat-ing it on down to its basic Beat-ness, the discovery of structure where mirrors crack the picture planes into what can be seen front and back and behind and beside, or a vegetal equivalent of an abstract-expressionist scrawl that blocks the picture surface–a genre of delirious possibility, but still anchored in the often rigid permanence of what looks like asides and throwaways): Lee Friedlander.
NOT (a gaze as steady as Buster Keaton’s wonders whether the industrial parks depicted manufacture pantyhose or megadeath; hip beyond irony or cool, where what passes for the so-called art world bleeds and leaks itself seamlessly into the so-called real world): Lewis Baltz.
NOT (a metropolis constructed by people for their discomfort, and which in turn refuses to reflect them in its curtain walls; eyes more alienated than Antonioni’s–eyes of an American veteran who returned with Vietnam locked in behind eyes that for years photographed without film or camera–eyes that stare at the traces of homelessness and the violence of wasted shooting sites where dolls’ heads hang for targets. Whether we edify or degrade we first create ruins, like Olympic sites once the games are gone and the local economy begins an unending hemorrhage): Anthony Hernandez.
NOT (the outrage rightly registered at the sight of a few trees that survive on the freeways of Los Angeles, or the stupefied faces of people on intimate terms with the thermonuclear unconscious of Colorado’s Rocky Flats): Robert Adams.
And certainly not the lush monumentality of nature declared only photographically: Ansel Adams. Nor the hermetic beauties of a Zen-inspired series of pictures, a variation of equivalences; but equivalent to–what?–in the world: Minor White.
Not far away, however. I haven’t lost Gossage; he’s been here all along. It’s just that it’s difficult to think negatively continuously (as Dylan sings, “A whole lot of nothing / Makes a man feel ill at ease”), to have cleared a space and to resist putting in it what belongs there. So I am going to give in just a little and transfer from absolute negation (since there is not much absolute negation, except for mathematical logic and Milton’s Satan who says, “I am the Spirit who Negates”) and indulge myself in some ‘not exactlys’ and ‘not quites’, and perhaps inch a little closer to what a Gossage photograph might be.
Not far away from Weegee’s crime scenes: with the bodies and the gawkers removed, all the stains in the streets and the curbside trash remains. Nature for Gossage is a place bristling with the attractive repulsion of armpits and crotches, and it is always alive, about to declare its animation, the shrubbery almost like David Lynch’s trees tossed in a night wind, violated by a motion characteristic of anxiety, dread, and agony. Premonition and foreboding settle in around a Gossage picture as atmospherically as Atget’s groundhogs in his parks.
I’ve come full circle, hinting what a Gossage photograph might be. Once, while making notes after years of reading Nietzsche, I abbreviated “the eternal recurrence of the same.” To my surprise the abbreviation read: “e.r.o.s.” Like Wallace Stevens in “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird,” I collapse, loaf, and invite my soul, unable to decide which I prefer, inflections or innuendoes, “The blackbird whistling / Or just after.”
2002 — Gus Blaisdell
Originally published in John Gossage, The Romance Industry: Venezia / Marghera 1998, Tucson: Nazareli Press, 2002.
On Slipping Across: Reading, Friendship, Otherness (from the introduction to Gus Blaisdell Collected UNM Press 2013)
by David B. Morris
Camerado! This is no book;
Who touches this, touches a man;
(Is it night? Are we here alone?)
It is I you hold, and who holds you;
I spring from the pages into your arms—decease calls me forth.
—Walt Whitman, “So Long!”1
There are worse fates for a writer than finding your book–ink still fresh from yesterday’s megastore signing event–in the remainder bin. That’s where Gus found me. As owner of an independent bookstore where he selected and very often read the books he sold, he knew that megastores order by corporate logarithm and sell in bulk, so their remainder bins are a treasure trove for books destined to fail the test of mass sales. I like to think my good fortune lay in having built a final chapter around ideas of everydayness borrowed from philosopher Stanley Cavell. Over our lunches, I learned that Gus talked weekly or daily by phone with the eminent Harvard thinker, who shared his passions for film, music, and complex mental explorations, minus the bombast. Luckily I hadn’t built my chapter around the obscure academic theorists whom Gus hated for their amped-up profundities and treated to colorful obscene denunciation.
An unknown caller asks if I’m the guy who wrote the book in the remainder bin. Swallowing my pride, I offer a noncommittal yes, and the caller says we should meet for lunch. So begins a deep friendship of contraries. When I last saw him Gus was teaching a film course he called “Teen Rebels.” Was it veiled indelicate autobiography? On his fingers, between the knuckle and first joint, I could just make out the faded tattoo letters l-o-v-e and h-a-t-e, one letter per finger, one word per hand. Unlike the commercial barbwire designs on biceps at my local gym, these ancient high school tattoos–self-inscribed with a sharp instrument and ballpoint pen–stood out both as verbal artifacts and as silent provocation, fists as texts, which hand do you want. With Gus you pretty much knew where you stood. Also, bodies mattered.
I never got to tell him that the poet’s one-long/two-short dactylic rhythm takes its name from the Greek word for finger (dactyl)–as fingers contain three bones, one long and two short. Gus liked a poetry of bodies. He was a connoisseur of bodies. He savored their local properties and earthy flavors like a devotee of fine wine. In paintings, on the big screen, in the classroom, bodies with their erotic charge fascinated him, and he could fall in love instantly with a crooked smile or well-filled denims. William Blake belonged in Gus’s personal pantheon, and it seems fitting that certain bedrock Blaisdell values would find expression in Blake’s Marriage of Heaven and Hell through the voice of the devil: “Man has no Body distinct from his Soul–for that called Body is a portion of the Soul discerned by the five Senses, the chief inlets of Soul in this age.”
Zen Buddhism offers another corrective to what Blake’s devil describes as the errors caused by all bibles and sacred codes. In this spirit, I suppose, Gus put me onto the fifteenth-century Japanese Zen master Ikkyū who wrote raunchy haikus about his sexual affair at age seventy-seven with a young blind temple attendant:
don’t hesitate to get laid
that’s wisdom
sitting around chanting
what crap2
We both loved the eros-inflected anti-cubist nudes of Amedeo Modigliani that Gus in a poem accurately described as women with “apricot thighs” and “offset twats.” The two dense, primal inscriptions on his hands–nouns? verbs? imperatives?–weren’t exactly pre-concrete one-word living poems carved into the flesh, fading as the flesh aged, but they sure weren’t decorations, and their position “in” the body (not on top of it) is serious stuff.
David Morris at home photo by Nicole Blaisdell Ivey Albuquerque, NM 2000
I also regret that I never got to ask him about Marlon Brando’s star-making turn in The Wild One (1951). Brando as leader of the pack is perhaps too post-adolescent to make the teen rebel course, although teens idolized him. I saw Gus, however, less as Brando than as Brando’s whacked-out rival gang leader, played by Lee Marvin. In contrast to Brando’s leathered-up, chip-on-the-shoulder, silent machismo, Marvin gabs incessantly. He is antihero to Brando’s antihero, twice removed from respectability, who would rather fight than win, and afterwards (sweat-stained and bloody) sits down with the winner for a beer. A trace of berserk androgyny in Marvin’s performance, like a body absent several crucial bones, exposes the oddly effete and rigid, passive-aggressive petulance that threatens to destabilize both Brando’s alpha-male vertical hierarchy and the entire fifties reverse morality play it underwrites (free-spirited bikers vs. repressed townspeople). Brando is still in uniform–biker uniform–right up to the shiny visor on his cap. So Gus slipped the mold, shape-shifting in my imagination from Brando to the grizzled, inscrutable, anarchic, crypto-androgyne and hedonist mutineer, Lee Marvin.
Lunch was our symposium, first at an eatery he chose so deep in the Latino zone that I feared for my life, later (perhaps as a concession) at a surprisingly upscale Nob Hill bistro where everyone knew him from manager to dishwashers, and occasionally in winter (as the snow fell) over a hot bowl of chili-with-polenta at the ambience-free Frontier Restaurant. We engineered a friendship that–with one exception–never saw the interior of a house. It was a nondomestic closeness that invoked, but rarely intersected with, our personal lives beyond the lunch table, as if we engaged in a deliberate mutual anthropology of thin description. We both shared a sense of how much the absent thickness mattered. The real presence in our conversations, however, was thought. Not just ideas or opinions. We talked about essays we were writing. We traded favorite writers and artists like kids swapping baseball cards. Those two faded words inked onto his hands governed his instinctual and considered response to the world, where he did not look for middle ground (as I did). Noncommittal relativist postmodern bureaucratic sellouts incensed him. When I knew Gus in the last years of his life, but I suspect this fact never changed, passion and thought always circled back to an interconnected triad of absolutes: family, friends, and art.
My vision of Gus, when Lee Marvin isn’t messing with my head, blends with Ezra Pound. Ego-driven, irascible, impossible, terms I would not apply to Gus although sometimes they brush close, Pound described his conversations with the young poets who visited him in Rapallo as their Ez-uversity. Our lunches were my Gus-uversity. I always learned so much more than I could possibly impart that I wondered why Gus put up with such an inherently losing transaction. Maybe he sensed an archaic teen rebel buried beneath my credentialed exterior, or more likely he just didn’t count costs. I learned that half the literary figures who interested me turned out to be his friends. During our lunch one time he was trying to decide if he would fly to California for Ken Kesey’s funeral. They’d known each other since the days of dropping acid at Stanford. The poet I called Robert Creeley was Bob. Once I mentioned a contemporary artist who amazed me away with his installations exploring various aspects of light. Did he know the work of James Turrell? Turns out they go back together to the sixties in Santa Monica. You mean Jim?
Samuel Johnson, according to a guy I knew, actually liked it when Boswell asked him those incessant moron questions such as why do foxes have a bushy tail. Non-thought can be a useful catalyst for thought. Young Boswell, inventor of the identity crisis, would leave himself self-fashioning notes that said, for example, “Be Mr. Addison” or “Be Macheath” (incompatible states of being, incidentally). Our lunchtime tandem somehow worked, but often I drove home wanting to leave myself little notes saying, “Be Gus.” His literary instincts were as right as Johnson’s–hardly infallible but never conventional, faint-hearted, or indecisive. It is Gus who awarded a fellowship to then unknown Leslie Marmon Silko. One day I saw a first-edition Ceremony for sale and warned him that somebody must have stolen it, because the fly leaf contained Silko’s handwritten thanks to Gus Blaisdell. No, it wasn’t stolen, he said. He didn’t believe in keeping a book just because it was valuable. An ideal time, in fact, to send it back into circulation. Not a book, however, that I would have let slip away.
“Slipping Across” is the title of a late essay Gus wrote, less an essay than an associative meditation or meditative slipping, and the two-word title repays consideration. It names a form of motion generally associated with bad results. You slip and fall. A stock price slips. A slip of the tongue exposes you. Orthodox people work hard to resist slippage, which is probably why it attracted Gus from the moment he found a fragment in The Greek Anthology that purported to be words spoken by Socrates: the philosopher’s erotic recollection of a kiss in which the soul (“poor thing”) hoped to slip across from lover to beloved. It is a paradoxical moment, joining transcendent hope and preordained failure: the soul is misguided, Socrates implies, because it doesn’t understand that you can’t just slip across. The moment for Gus prefigures the mysterious, tentative, possible/impossible union of writer and reader. As writer, Gus understood and accepted difficulties inherent in writing. “Yet the reader,” he says correctly, “is a problem.”
What is problematic concerns precisely the potential for slipping across–an ecstatic union and inevitable disunion–basic to an act of reading, which Gus characterizes as more passionate and more fleeting in its erotic intoxication than the memory of a soul kiss (did it happen?) between the middle-aged, snub-nosed, barefoot philosopher-satyr, Socrates, and the celebrated poet, Agathon, host of the famous drinking party devoted to the subject of love that Plato immortalized in The Symposium. Leave it to Gus to invent an erotics of reading. (As inventor, Gus cheerfully ignores and subsumes both the lustiness of Walt Whitman’s writer, reaching out to embrace the reader, and the prurience of Roland Barthes’s receptive reader, desiring his/her own ravishment.)
Over lunch during its lengthy genesis we often talked about the ideas that surface in “Slipping Across,” although I didn’t then know its title or grasp its focus on reading. Oddly, the image that occupied our talk then holds a less prominent position in the finished essay–Rachel Whiteread’s Holocaust Memorial–which receives a scant paragraph plus. It is worth pausing over that sculptural monument here because it stands as a central metaphor for the complications of a slipping-across reading. It compresses in an image, appropriately mute, both the impossibility of reading and reading as impossible.
It is the cast-concrete replica of a personal library, such as Nazis confiscated from Vienna’s murdered, doomed, or departed Jews (the people of the Book). But it is a library suppressed, stripped to its inner core, negated and turned to stone. A cast made directly from a book-lined room, the monument is a library’s death mask. The books (reversed on their shelves so that the spines face inward) are unreadable, the serried pages facing the viewer are lodged within the solidified cube of the library’s interior and cannot be opened.
As Gus notes, an inscription on the Holocaust Memorial reads: “In commemoration of the more than 65,000 Austrian Jews who were killed by the Nazis between 1938 and 1945.” Around the base are inscribed in readerly script the names of the death camps to which Nazis sent the dispossessed Jews, including, in alphabetical order, Auschwitz, Belzec, Bergen-Belsen, Brcko, Buchenwald, Chelmno. . . .
Human mortality is not Whiteread’s subject–or at least not in Gus’s slipping-across interpretation–but rather catastrophic loss and, as its entailment, the impasse and obstruction that make reading impossible. Impossible in two senses. The Holocaust Memorial remembers the impossibility of reading under totalitarian regimes, where book burners seek to immobilize the autonomous movement that makes reading always potentially subversive, like a nighttime raid slipping across enemy lines. Totalitarian regimes attempt to stifle reading in order to solidify their own deathly power, much as the marmoreal cast stone of the Holocaust Memorial fossilizes (in rigor mortis pallor) all the rich colors and complications of a living library. As good, almost, to kill a man as kill a good book, wrote John Milton in his pro-dissent, anti-monarchial tract against censorship. (In its complexities, however, Areopagitica says it’s necessary to restrict Catholic writings, as a counter to the perceived totalitarian hold of the papacy.) Reading, through its slippage and its intimate link with eros, supplies an antidote to totalitarianism’s monolithic rigidity, operating as an implicit act of defiance, resistance, and insubordination.
The implicit political dimensions of reading, however, invoke a deeper conflict native to the desired union between reader and writer. The impossibility of reading in this second sense, as reflected in Whiteread’s Memorial, recognizes the forlorn failures of eros. The readerly desire for communion with writers, a genuine moment of slipping across, resembles the slippery goal of erotic experience: the lineaments of gratified desire, in the phrase of William Blake that haunted Gus. An initial sense of lack, an inherent absence and elusiveness, marks the erotic act of reading, and erotic affirmation cannot overcome the problem that reading involves an encounter with our own separateness, a confrontation with ineluctable otherness, reconfigured as the unreadable. As Gus notes of Whiteread’s muffled monument, the library’s doors are without hinges and, like the reversed and moribund books that line its walls, they are un-openable, forever closed to us: access denied. A cenotaph formed of unreadable books, Whiteread’s Holocaust Memorial poses a confrontation with impenetrable separateness. It does not redeem loss and impossibility so much as it makes them visible, marks them, gives them form and coherence. Thus it renders catastrophe almost bearable in order that catastrophic loss cannot be lost on its viewers (and would-be readers), who must stand before it forever deprived of access to its elusive interior, shut out, definitively bereft.
His Total Heaviness in front of The Living Batch Bookstore 1997 photo by Nicole Blaisdell Ivey
No heavy-metal rock star had a longer tongue, and it served Gus effectively in critical evaluation of movies, ideas, and politicians as well as in his trademark ironic leer. Two extended tongues-out is the evaluation he might likely assign to my account of his “Slipping Across,” where stone, ashes, loss, and absence prove mainly an undertone, a passing (if recurrent) shadow, a whispered reminder that readers and reading form the more problematic side of an unstable equation. The readerly soul never quite manages to slip across, and slipping across always entails slipping back. Writers and writing, by contrast, he affirms in all their unproblematic madness–Orpheus absolved of his fateful backward glance: what writer wouldn’t look back?–and the affirmation has something big to do with generosity and friendship. Many writers, that is, were not so much names on books as people he knew, made it his point to know, and wrapped in the wide, promiscuous, Whitmanesque embrace of his friendship.
Friendship is not a topic Gus wrote about, objectified, but the enabling state or non-native ground from which he wrote, much like his adoptive and beloved New Mexico. It is remarkable how much of his writing, published and unpublished, responded to a request from a friend. Friends knew his value–he was utterly careless about what anyone else might think of him–in fact, he cultivated a style that dared you to misjudge him and simultaneously said he really didn’t give a shit. So friendship was a special condition that nourished writing, much like family. He doubtless knew the classical tradition that defines friends as second selves, an alter ego, sharing complete sympathy in all matters of importance. Cicero’s De Amicitia, however, while full of insight about the importance of friendship, would not survive the contempt in “Slipping Across” for narcissists “whose lips kiss only images of themselves.” Friendships for Gus were, like reading, encounters with otherness. I have met only three people over the course of my life who were gifted in friendship to the degree that, say, Michael Jordan was gifted in basketball. Gus, among them, is unparalleled. Friendship, most often but not always nourished by writing and reading and, yes, by New Mexico, was the medium in which he, simply, lived his life and soared.
Bookseller, publisher, writer: Gus did it all except maybe glue the bindings. Always too with an eye toward his friends, whose work he loved to publish, allowing their words to slip across from breath or mind to print, from writer to reader. A culminating convergence of art, friendship, and otherness finds expression in a small wrapper-bound collection of poems by Robert Creeley, which Gus published in 200 copies on the occasion of Creeley’s February 2000 reading at the Outpost Performance Space, in Albuquerque. The collection is titled, significantly, For Friends. Creeley dedicates each poem to a specific friend, and what unites the collection is moments when friendship mixes with desire and loss. His poem for Allen Ginsberg confronts the bitter moment when loss materializes in the death of a friend. Its title and underlying trope (the loss and re-animation of desire) derive from a short poem in which Walt Whitman describes his dulled response to hearing a lecture by a learned astronomer. Bored, Whitman exits the lecture hall in a “gliding” motion somewhat like slipping out and wanders alone into what he calls the “mystical moist night-air,” looking up at times (“in perfect silence”) at the stars.3 The stars–representing the natural world in its grandeur–reanimate desire lost in a lecture choked with charts and secondhand academic data about stars. The trajectory of Whitman’s poem–the loss and reanimation of desire–resembles fire/desire, banked and almost dead, suddenly blazing back to life. It is a reminder that learning for Gus sparked desire–as in his long riff in “Slipping Across” about Victor Hugo and the history of library architecture–just as, in turn, the desire to write kindled a desire to learn. Like Ezra Pound, Gus had made his own distinctive emancipation pact with Whitman.
Creeley’s elegy for Ginsberg begins in darkness and loss so deep that no star can pierce it. The night’s silence is not perfect or mystical, as for Whitman, but an image of absence lacking even the twitter of birds. Direct contact with the natural world is no longer adequate to offset loss. It offers no consolation, no reanimation of desire. Somehow the poem manages to move through all this negation–disharmony, loss, darkness–to a wholly unsentimental conclusion in which death is not overcome or transcended but rather opposed with the poet’s minimalist tools of rhymed words that ricochet like wild bells. This poetic response to silence and death and supreme unredeemed absence–the loss of a close friend and the death of a truly original poet–builds a threadbare credible affirmation from sounds so primal and unadorned as to evoke the rawest raw material of poetry, but therefore also not negligible, not nothing. In its resistance to the sublime and its starry skies, this raw and minimal not-nothingness, out of which poetry and writing emerge, seems exactly the right affirmation with which to remember Gus Blaisdell, another Creeley friend, and to reaffirm his impossible slipping-across erotics of reading, his desire to write that directed his life, his no-holds-barred embrace of otherness, his genius for friendship:
There is no end
to desire,
to Blake’s fire
to Beckett’s mire,
to any such whatever.
Old friend’s dead
In bed.
Old friends die.
Goodbye!
Fire, mire, desire: drive he sd books / Albuquerque, New Mexico.
DAVID BROWN MORRIS, an emeritus professor of literature at the University of Virginia, is the author of numerous books. His latest Ten Thousand Central Parks; A Climate-Change Parable is out in 2025. https://davidbmorris.com/
Notes:[1] Walt Whitman, “So Long!” in Leaves of Grass (1871-72). The poem is an addition to the Leaves of Grass 1860 first edition. http://www.whitmanarchive.org/
2 Ikkyū, Crow with No Mouth, trans. Stephen Berg, Port Townsend, WA: Copper Canyon Press, 2000, p. 54.
3 Walt Whitman, “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer,” in Leaves of Grass (1867). The poem is an addition to the Leaves of Grass 1860 first edition. http://www.whitmanarchive.org/
4 Robert Creeley, “When I heard the learn’d astronomer…” in The Collected Poems of Robert Creeley, 1975-2005, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.
The visionary poet Ronald Johnson reading from his manuscript “The Imaginary Menagerie” reached a short passage so arresting in its lapidary compression that it deserves to be cut in stone:
who once have sung
snug in the oblong
oblivion
Inscriptions are meant to pull you up short. “Stop, Traveler” is the most common beginning on the inscribed gravestones that bordered ancient Roman highways. Inscriptions in this elegiac genre give speech back to the dead. In Basil Bunting’s poem Briggflatts, a stonemason extols his craft:
Words!
Pens are too light.
Take a chisel to write.
Words, however weighty, bear a curiously unstable relation to stone. In Notre Dame de Paris Victor Hugo has Claude Frollo point at a book as he gestures from his cell window toward the sphinx-like shape of Notre Dame cathedral and utters the phrase: ceci tuera celá: This will kill that.
The chapter that follows this moment is called “Ceci tuera celá” and details the great dialectic of books undoing the Church, a story of freedom increasing through dissemination of the press, of a journey from dark to light, of the spreading literacy producing enlightenment, the testament of stone replaced by the testaments of the printing press.
Hugo’s main source about the history of architecture was the young Neo-Grec architect Henri Labrouste. Later, as if inspired to counter Hugo’s and Frollo’s prophecy, Labrouste built the Bibliothèque Ste-Geneviève. Free at last of the long-standing French obsession with the classical architectural orders, it is a library that reads like a book. Neil Levine, in a magisterial essay on Ste-Geneviève, Labrouste, and Hugo, reads the architectural details in an extended metaphor not only of the book but of the whole process of printing from movable type–from the names on the façade (which may be seen as type locked into chases) to the books of these authors that sit on the shelves directly behind the places where their names appear on the wall. Labrouste built a book of iron and stone that was functional and free, a building dedicated to contemplation and reading, absorption and study. It became a secular version of Hugo’s description of the Temple of Solomon. “It was not merely the binding of it, it was the sacred book itself. From each of its concentric ring-walls, the priests could read the word translated and made manifest to the eye, and could thus follow its transformations from sanctuary to sanctuary until, in its ultimate tabernacle, they could grasp in its most concrete yet still architectural form: the ark. Thus the word was enclosed in the building, but its image was on the envelope like the human figure on the coffin of a mummy.” Labrouste made his library perfectly reflexive and transparent, no difference between the inside and outside.
Hugo set his novel in 1482. Sixty-one years earlier, 12 March 1421, a congregation of Jews burned themselves alive in a synagogue on Judenplatz in Vienna rather than renounce their faith or be murdered by Christians. A plaque in Latin from 1497 commemorates the immolation by referring to the Jews as dogs or curs. Mozart wrote Cosi fan tutte in house 244 overlooking Judenplatz in 1783. On 12 March 1938, Nazi troops entered Vienna, 517 years to the day that the Jews burned themselves. Rachel Whiteread, a young British sculptor, unveiled her remarkable Holocaust memorial on Judenplatz on 25 October 2000, much delayed by politics from its originally scheduled completion date of 9 November 1996, the fifty-eighth anniversary of Kristallnacht.
Before the memorial could be built excavations began on Judenplatz to unearth the original synagogue. The first area dug down to was the bimah, the area where the ark is kept and the desk from which the Torah is read. Whiteread’s memorial measures 12′ x 24′ x 33′ and is a library turned inside out: the spines of the books face into the building. It is a cast made in white cement of the library’s interior. The doors, without hinges or handles, cannot be opened. The library cannot be entered because the imaginary interior, far from being empty, is solid: the presence of absence. “Casting the internal–If Rachel could drink a couple of quarts of plaster or pour resin down her throat, wait until it sets and then peel herself away, I feel she would. She shows us the unseen, the inside out, the parts that go unrecognized,” observed A. M. Homes.
John Baldessari, the California conceptual artist, still has nine and a half boxes of the ashes of his paintings. In 1969, when he realized that he would stop painting, he found a crematorium that would burn his paintings. His motive was to complete the cycle of the chemicals that made up his oil paints by returning them to earth. The original installation at the Jewish Museum in New York was to be an urn containing some of the ashes placed in one wall with a plaque beside it. A major funder of the show said she would withdraw funding if this was done. So Baldessari placed the urn on a pedestal. The urn he chose among the many on offer was in the shape of a book. This was the beginning of conceptual art, the ashes of paintings interred in an urn shaped like a book.
Horace (Odes 3.30.1) claimed he had written poems more enduring (perennior) than bronze and outlasting the pyramids. In “Lector Aere Perennior”–the reader more enduring than bronze–J. V. Cunningham disagrees with Horace. Every poet depends not just on paper or stone or bronze but on readers for his relative immortality. Yet the reader is a problem. What must the reader do if the poet is to have lasting fame? For Cunningham the reader must be:
Some man so deftly mad
His metamorphosed shade,
Leaving the flesh it had,
Breathes on the words they made.
The reader dies (the orgasmic “little death” of the text) that the poet may live again. Transported by the words of the poet, the reader transmigrates his soul and “breathes on the words they make.” His and mine become ours, a more amazing dialectic than turning the book of stone into the book of print.
An epigram by Plato had been a favorite of mine long before Ronald Johnson read to me from his inscription-like “Imaginary Menagerie.” Plato writes that it is said by Socrates to Agathon:
Kissing Agathon, I found
My soul at my lips.
Poor thing!
–It went there, hoping
To slip across.
It is one of the epigrams from The Greek Anthology. Is it somewhere carved in stone? Did each passing Greek read it aloud? Were the lines alternately painted black and red? As the Greek read the epigram aloud his soul too was at his lips, trying to slip across. From his lips to the stone, in a direction opposite that of Socrates whose lips were meeting those welcoming closed lips of Agathon. It is the soul that remembers and speaks in the poem, from within Socrates’ silence.
But though the soul rises to slip across it is a poor thing because it falls back–desire wants to slip across, believes in its heart that metempsychosis is possible, in its delusion a poor thing. This is the giving soul, the one that acknowledges and welcomes the other, not the Freudian narcissists whose lips kiss only images of themselves. And this happens every time we read.
When we read we slip across; we do not fall back. The words they made are like the love we had: the poem read through is like the exhausted beloved, over there, on the other side where we just were. The reader succeeds precisely where Orpheus fails Eurydice. We look back fondly. We behold the lineaments of gratified desire, what men and women in each other do require.
Chris Marker’s film La Jetée (The Jetty, France, 1962) runs 28 minutes and is constructed entirely of stills, except for a single moment of movement.
A brief synopsis of La Jetée will put the complexity of this moment in perspective. The Third World War has taken place; the earth is radioactive, uninhabitable; the victors rule underground over a kingdom of rats; concentration camps flourish one again. The story is of a veteran who survived the war and who carries within him a single image of peacetime: a woman’s face he had seen as a child on the jetty at Orly Airport. Because his imagery is so vivid the camp commandants subject him to experiments: he is injected, travels to the past and eventually to the future. He finds the woman he saw as a child; they fall in love. The moment of movement occurs after they consummate their love.
The woman opens her eyes and blinks three times, looking directly out of the screen. She wakes to look at her lover looking at her. He is not seen by us, but his presence is established by a series of overlapping dissolves in which the sleeping woman changes positions as she sleeps and he watches. The sound over these shots is of bird cries reaching a crescendo–so intense the cries sound like squeals of pain, a mysterious jouissance. (Could this be a Blakean moment? “How do you know but ev’ry Bird that cuts the airy way / Is an immense world of delight, clos’d by your senses five?”)
One of the abiding mysteries of film is that it is a medium of visible absence. In a notebook poem William Blake asked and answered several specific questions, among them the following:
What is it men do in women require?
The lineaments of Gratified Desire.
What is it women do in men require?
The lineaments of Gratified Desire.
To my knowledge, even using what he called his “infernal methods,” Blake never engraved these lapidary lines.
What happens when we read a story, a poem, a book, a building? Are we deftly mad enough to slip over? We love what looks back at us, studying to know everything, knowing the knowledge of love is inexhaustible, and knowing also that such work of the imagination is beyond the reach of even our best words. After having slipped across we return to ourselves, our experience enriched. The reader is like Jacob, blessed by the angel he wrestled. Touched on the thigh before he was released, Jacob was left with a limp. The angel touches us before we are released. If there is a new limp once we return from our struggle, our abandon, our transport, it is the happy fault–the felix culpa–that touches another soul, and both are the better for it. The poet gains his brief immortality; and we return to our mortality exhausted and renewed. Within those moments of movement while we read, and remembering what we read, acknowledging the autonomy and mystery of it, we briefly become the kind of person Henry James wished us to become: one on whom nothing is lost.
Gus Blaisdell 2003
Unpublished. This essay was originally intended for Inscriptions, a deluxe-edition book that was produced by Jack W. Stauffacher in 2003 to commemorate the lapidary inscriptions on the Old Public Library of San Francisco on the occasion of the building’s conversion into a new museum of Asian art. In the end, however, the essay was not used.
I recently found my high school textbook of Hamlet. A number of things about that edition surprised me, the first being that it was an interlinear edition, suggesting that we could not read Shakespeare without a trot or pony. I remembered such editions from my Latin classes, where of course they were forbidden, scorned as crutches, and used only surreptitiously outside of school. The second thing that caught my attention was that the fore-edge of my Hamlet was crudely marked in black ink with the school motto, as was the inside endpaper of the front cover: Tolle lege. Since magic markers did not exist in the early fifties I assume I’d used India ink, perhaps the stopper from the bottle, an ink our mothers used to identify our childhood underwear and clothing before sending us off to camp or, in my case, away to a military boarding school. (During the Second World War, I was known as “the little soldier,” as well as “the little man,” and all of our family of three were in uniform for the duration, my father a naval officer, my mother in the Red Cross, and myself in an itchy woolen miniature of West Point gray, impossible in the Southern California heat.) That same India ink we also used in gang initiations, for tattoos. Thirdly, across the free endpaper of my Hamlet sprawls the scrawl of my signature, blatantly less interested in legibility than in securing some adolescent dream of singularity, as the tattoos were supposed to have done at a slightly earlier period.
My high school, St. Augustine’s, was run by Augustinian priests who prided themselves on being one of the original teaching orders. It was an all boys’ school, the only one in a county boasting eight Catholic girls’ schools, where the nuns lectured the girls that they should only date Catholic boys. We used to taunt the most pious boys by wisecracking that, after all, Martin Luther had been an Augustinian, a joke not regarded as witty by the priests. The school motto, as I mentioned, was Tolle lege, Take it and read. The origin of this phrase marks one of the most remarkable moments in Augustine’s Confessions, his conversion in the garden in Milan. Sitting under a fig tree Augustine hears a child’s voice chanting as if in the singsong of some children’s game, Tolle lege. Tolle lege. He has been in an agony of desire, torn between two warring wills, those of his higher and lower natures. The book he has at hand in the garden is the Epistles of St. Paul. He seizes it and opens it at random, a sortilege of longing and agony. The book opens to Romans 13:13, 14: “Not in reveling and in drunkenness, not in lust and in wantonness, not in quarrels and in rivalries. Rather, arm yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ; spend no more thought on nature and nature’s appetites.” Augustine continues, “I had no wish to read more and no need to do so. For in an instant, as I came to the end of the sentence, it was as though a light of confidence flooded into my heart and all the darkness of doubt was dispelled.” (Bk 8:12.) Sortilege, which means divination by using a book, was also practiced in the Roman Empire by consulting the Aeneid.
Augustine’s conversion was from the flesh to the spirit. The state of his agonized longing is structurally characteristic of adolescence. The state of my own adolescent longings was in the opposite directions. Such pieties and theological longings as I may have possessed disappeared (agonizingly, of course) when, at age nineteen, I began my first long term sexual intimacy. Nineteen was the age at which my namesake resolved, upon reading Cicero’s Hortensius, that philosophy would be his path. The antithesis of Romans 13 was my philosophical path: sex and drugs and jazz (rock-and-roll I fellow-traveled for the sex and drugs). So it was two summers after the summer of love, 1969, that I first met Jack Stauffacher. This brings me, less circuitously than might appear, to continuing my praise of Jack’s Greenwood Press, directly now rather than obliquely.
Gus Blaisdell editor at UNM Press
Unbeknownst to me, my eventually meeting Jack began three years earlier, when I was an editor at the University of New Mexico Press working on books and also on the New Mexico Quarterly. When I joined the press, its production was notoriously low, mainly because the director insisted on designing many of the books himself and was extremely slow. A university-wide study group concluded that the one thing the press needed above all else was a professional designer. So in 1966 the press hired Frank Mahood, a student of Jack’s at Carnegie Tech and later the designer at Syracuse. I remember the coincidence of looking through his portfolio and noticing that he had designed Ernest Bacon’s Notes on the Piano. Joseph Bacon, guitarist, lutanist, painter, and philosopher, had been a friend of mine since college, and I always took such coincidences as serendipitous. Joe has been a friend of Jack’s for some time. It is not so much that what goes around comes around as that things meant to be will connect.
When he arrived, the first book that Frank designed happened to be the first book I had edited for UNM Press. So it was here that I began to learn about the art of typography, here I first heard Jack’s name and learned how he taught Frank the use of Bodoni, the first name of a type that I ever heard. Prior to Frank’s tenure I knew nothing about typography.
On Thanksgiving Day 1966, Alan Swallow, whose books I had been distributing locally since moving to New Mexico, died at his typewriter in Denver. I began commuting to Denver on weekends to help with running Swallow Press, and it happened that my great teacher Yvor Winters’ last two books, Forms of Discovery and its companion anthology, Quest for Reality, were mine to design. I was thrilled; Frank, whose guidance I sought, was reluctant but helpful nonetheless. I learned about Gill faces for the first time, and got a firsthand acquaintance with Electra, which was the body type for New Mexico Quarterly, and Perpetua. It was in this period of enthusiasm that I first read Updike (D. B., not John). The last book I designed, and the only one for UNM Press, was N. Scott Momaday’s The Way to Rainy Mountain. The connections between all the dramatis personae in the little drama of Rainy Mountain–Swallow, Winters, Momaday, Mahood, Stauffacher, and me–is worth a digression, especially since I seem to recall once hearing that the essay is the art of controlled digression. The question is where to start disentangling the actors so they can be re-entangled anew.
Winters sent me a copy of The Reporter containing a memoir of Momaday’s of the same title as the book to be, a remembrance of his Kiowa heritage. The appended note from Winters stated that Momaday was the greatest poet in the language since, I suppose, Frederick Goddard Tuckerman, whose poems Momaday edited for a new edition in 1965, and he is the youngest poet included in Winters’ critical summa, Forms of Discovery. Winters also mentioned that New Mexico Quarterly had first published Scott’s early poetry and that Scott had a novel with Harpers, and that Swallow had rejected a poetry collection.
After reading Scott’s memoir and early poetry, and contacting his editor at Harper and Row, who chanced to be a college classmate, I wrote Scott suggesting he consider a book along the lines of his Kiowa memoir. He replied that a livre de luxe of further Rainy Mountain material was forthcoming, that he would send a copy along, and then, depending on what I thought of the new material, we could think about a book. I thought the additional material was as wonderful as the original. Scott put a manuscript together so well written that it needed no editing, and in accordance with the press rules, we submitted it to outside readers–anthropologists, alas. They determined it wasn’t anthropology and objected to its James Fenimore Cooper-like sentimentalities. Normally, this would have finished the book. But I was outraged at their imaginative insensitivity and their critical superciliousness, their willful proprietarian ignorance. So I decided to resubmit the manuscript to a new selection of outside readers–writers, this time, not anthropologists. Janet Lewis, Evan Connell, William Gass, William Eastlake, Paul Horgan, Wallace Stegner, Edward Abbey, and others responded at length to the literary masterpiece that Rainy Mountain is. Loaded for many bears with a lot of big guns, I took the book to committee where it passed unanimously.
Design was the next task, which I undertook enthusiastically under Frank Mahood’s tutelage. Optima had become a fashionable passion of mine and Frank guided me in the layout. Italics (or oblique) sections we set in type outside the printing plant at Joe Reay’s Typographic Service, the only fonts of Optima in the state. At this point Scott suggested his father, Al, a distinguished Kiowa artist, as illustrator. Frank decided the illustrations should be bled, printed without any boarder or frame on the entire page. We picked the cloth for the binding and Frank did the title page. I go into all this to correct the misattribution of the design to Bruce Gentry, who did only the layout of the dust jacket, from designs of Frank’s and mine. But Frank, working for a typographically ignorant commercial director, left in 1968. I followed in 1969, and when I saw finished copies of the book I was outraged at Gentry’s crediting himself with a design that was, beyond the wrapper, in no way his.
This was the summer, 1969, in which I first met Jack, who had left Stanford University Press under circumstances similar to Frank’s and my departures from UNM.
Gus at Jack Stauffacher’s Greenwood Press San Francisco 1986
1999
Published as “A Vigorous Lucidity” in A Typographic Journey: The History of the Greenwood Press and a Bibliography, 1934 – 2000, San Francisco, Book Club of California, 1999. This version is from an undated computer print-out manuscript inscribed with marker: “Stauffacher / Book Editing History.”
Robert Creeley reading at The Living Batch bookstore Albuquerque, New Mexico
From the Editor’s Preface to Gus Blaisdell Collected
Darkness sur- / rounds us
I Know a Man
As I sd to my
friend, because I am
always talking, –John, I
sd which was not his
name, the darkness sur-
rounds us, what
can we do against
it, or else, shall we &
why not, buy a goddamn big car,
drive, he sd, for
christ’s sake, look
out where yr going.
–Robert Creeley
Gus had a special fondness for this poem by his longtime friend Robert Creeley. He took one of its key phrases for the name of one of his publishing imprints, drive he sd books. He also paid homage to Creeley’s poem at the close of the long essay “Buried Silk Exhumed.” There he presented an imaginary anecdote about two of his favorite jazz musicians, Thelonious Monk and Dizzy Gillespie, driving (presumably in a “goddamn big car,” top down, shades masking their eyes) along the California coast. “It’s always night,” Gus has Monk remark idly, gazing off to the shimmering afternoon horizon, “because it’s only light when the sun’s up.” To which he has Diz respond, “Monk, you are one deep cat.”
Gus, too, was a deep cat. And while he loved jokes, lively conversation, and tall tales with an intellectual spin, darkness, like Monk’s perpetual night, shadows much of the writing brought together in this book. It is the darkness of human finitude. While we hardly know what truly drives us, it’s a dread of darkness that jump-starts the helter-skelter getaway in Creeley’s poem, apprehension marked with that stammered line break voicing how darkness “sur- / rounds us.” Darkness, in Creeley’s rendering, hovers over us in ominous supremacy and encloses us within its limiting sphere, a nifty turn on Shakespeare’s “our little life is rounded with a sleep” that Gus surely admired.
Like Creeley, Gus brought the instincts of a poet to his philosophical confrontations with darkness. In “Original Face,” an essay about a round, black, tondo-shaped painting by Allan Graham called Moon 2, Gus explores the darkness that precedes consciousness and is our constant companion. He quotes an ancient Zen koan, “Before your mother and father were born, what was your original face?”, to recall for us the darkness of unknowing out of which we have come, and to remind us that we must always look out from behind our own faces, remaining as dark to ourselves as the far side of the moon. Ultimately, self-knowledge, and the relationship of the self to the world, is the central issue addressed in these writings.
“Become the kind of person on whom nothing is lost.” Henry James’s advice to a young writer became a kind of mantra for Gus. It defined for him the task of the critic as well as the poet, and he felt it should be applied to everyday life. You have to observe closely and bring all that you know into your response. As a critic Gus assumes the role of an exemplary responder, showing what it’s like to attend to the work at hand. His essays frequently begin with a kind of preamble (before they take the mind for a walk), in which he tells of his difficulties in trying to come to terms with his topic, the struggle with the evolving hydra-headed implications that would occur to him as he tried to think about it conceptually and get his thoughts down on paper. “Original Face” is the most extraordinary response to a work of art that I have ever encountered. Gus simply presents himself to the work of art, confronts its singularity with his own, and engages with it as a fully embodied consciousness.
“Self-knowledge, no matter how fragmentary and tenuous,” Gus wrote in the 1960s, “is the right kind of knowledge, the dialogue between ourselves and ourselves and between ourselves and the external world.” No matter what the ostensible topic might be—movies, photographs, or the expressive qualities of various works of art, literature, or philosophy that he admired—Gus’s writing revolves around the quest for knowledge of the self and the search for understanding our human placement in the world.
There is a problem, however, at the very heart of the quest for self-knowledge. As Gus once observed about self-consciousness, “It’s interesting that the self, as a prefix, keeps its hyphen, never quite combining with the consciousness it engenders; no, that engenders it.” Consciousness of the self drops a shadow between the self and itself, just as it also intervenes between the self and the world. The black hole of solipsism is poised to suck us in, and the threat of skepticism, with its murky doubts and its despair of certainty (since our physical senses are notoriously untrustworthy and our knowledge of other minds always feels problematic), clouds our outlook on the world “out there.” Darkness “sur-rounds us” indeed.
“How does one get out of the monstrous enclosures of the egocentric self?” Gus asked, writing of his early interest in such philosophers as Descartes and Hume, who agonized over these issues. In a letter to Ross Feld he tells of his early “romance” with the mind/body dualism of Descartes: “I was in search of the idea which engendered the body in the world, as was he [Descartes]. His idea was God, one in which content leads to existence. But that doesn’t work for me. God, for me, is a name for the fruitfulness of our ignorance, a thinking in the dark that pushes us on, and on: a fruitful ignorance.”
So Gus’s God is associated with “a thinking in the dark that pushes us on.” According to Wittgenstein, a key philosopher in Gus’s development, “Thought does not strike us as mysterious while we are thinking, but only when we say, as it were retrospectively: ‘How was that possible?’ How was it possible for thought to deal with the very object itself? We feel as if by means of it we had caught reality in our net.” (Philosophical Investigations, I # 428) But the truth is that neither reality nor the thinking self can be so easily caught. Our only net is language, and our words and our thoughts form substitutes, their referents eerily undetermined. “In the actual use of expressions we make detours, we go by side-roads,” says Wittgenstein (PI, I # 426), “We see the straight highway before us, but of course we cannot use it, because it is permanently closed.” Nevertheless, Gus seems to say, since you’re in the driver’s seat, for christ’s sake, look out where yr going! The line might just be the central message of Gus’s writings, which often, in their pursuit of grace and self-knowledge, take on the sound of admonishing sermons.
A tribute to Robert Creeley on his 70th birthday
Intro
I began secretly studying Japanese in junior high school, military phrase books and character dictionaries, only a couple of years after the war. During the war the woodblock prints and ink-painting scrolls were removed from the walls and I had a fascination with both enemies, playing those roles whenever we played guns and war. The other kids always praised me, “Blaisdell, you really know how to die!” My father, a naval officer, served in the Pacific and again during the Korean war, having his own squadron of destroyers–I loved calling them “tin cans.” He used to send me black, hard rubber models of enemy aircraft, the kind used by spotters for identification, three-dimensional versions of those silhouettes that filled the pages of treasured manuals, and also cast-metal model ships, the kind used in war rooms to plot sea battles. In miniature I had the Japanese fleet and a model of the Nagato, the low-slung battleship whose fate it would unforgettably be to surf up the gigantic stem of the atom bomb tested at Bikini.
My mother divorced my father after Korea. He had been at best intermittent during my childhood, disappearing immediately after Pearl Harbor; returning exhausted and raving only once during the war–they said it was “almost a complete nervous breakdown” (so I guess it was incomplete)–he would not recur in my life until we met when I was twenty-five, a graduate student making myself miserable by trying to find in positivism and mathematical logic something I might call “philosophy.”
As an undergraduate I studied Japanese formally. My hope by this time, unknown during the secret improvisations with phrase books and character dictionaries, always happy in the search there for radicals, was that one day I wanted to read Basho’s Oku no Hosomochi in the original. Dream on! Today, forty years past those upper and lower divisions, over thiry years in our beloved New Mexico–where even conversationally there is little chance of speaking the lingo–a stumblebum among romanji, the kanas and kanji, I still re-read Basho with love and with an always aroused memory of an ambition more youthful than each aboriginal, preasurable, reawakening.
What these flirtations with Japanese gave me, especially the more sophisticated formal one, was a lifelong passion for nikki, the Japanese poetic diary. In my ambition I saw it as a possible literary form, the condition of the prose demanding poetry, and vice-versa; the two in their mutual inspiration creating a third: neither prose nor poetry, and yet both; not something over and above, yet along side and out of, like love consummated, desire gratified, or Eve from Adam’s rib (she is our way of leaving him behind, naming his animals, while we explore the garden and discover the bad girl in ourselves—tempted, seduced and exalted—a real idea of education, in abandon).
2
Nikki: Daybook on Insistence
“The insistence was a part of a reconciliation”
–“The Operation,” from For Love
A couple of weeks ago I started thinking about your 70th birthday, 21 May 1926. That’s a lot of days, twenty-four thousand, nine hundred and twenty, to be exact, like they say. But what exactness is that? Life in days and numbers, the daily and material lost in numerical abstractions.
I know your idiom, can through ear call it to mind like having a poem by heart, line after line in the rhythm of time, unfolding.
But this was to be a gift, one given back for the one you are: it is divine to you to give. You bless. You speak of friends as being good news–yes, gospel, and you evangelical, and by announcing names you touch them. Friendship is not just hanging out, the way circumstances stand around their possibilities, guilty as every bystander, hands in turned-out pockets–this company hand in hand, loafing most invitingly while hearing the soul in the song.
Knowing the idiom, the lingo is always refreshed by yet another reading; in the mother tongue less chance of being a stumblebum though head over heels in love with the sound of it. I read For Love at a sitting on a hot afternoon. I began noting favorite words, phrases, diction, thinking to assemble them in a bouquet, like The Greek Anthology; but in no time I was writing down titles, acknowledging the unparaphrasable integrity of the poems, page after page, poem upon poem, my own selected bulking up. Would it be the same on another reading? I trust not: it would accumulate like a reef until all I had in hand was the book itself.
A note: insisted: to be of use / measured sense / puts hands and candles in / minds caressed and light / let it. What need of light when love guides hands.
Another note: wicker basket / woven, like a text, to fit what it contains / is never more than an extension of content. / Three of them brought wisdom over the highest mountains in the world: Tripitaka: one of discipline, the second of wisdom, and the third contained metaphysics. The baskets disappear beyond imagination and what remains? The poems they are / as they are.
3
Insistence is urgent, pressing, and it lasts, compelling attention. In the interview the other guy said he thought Lacy was a wonderful original. “I do too,” you said, “He’s tough. He stays put.”
There’s the idiomatic insistent rhythm that I hear repeatedly in Luther’s “Hier stehe ich, ich kann nichts anders.”
That Hardy older man of Echoes’ “First Rain,” momently Catullian in “Self Portrait,” finding the composure of “Stone” (Aquinas: “Stones point toward their homes”) and the winning abandon of “Echoes”: “Say yes to the wasted / empty places. The guesses / Were as good as any.”
Sometimes when I imagine our New Mexico I see the volcanic and flat horizon of the West Mesa, rearing eternally its arid tsunami above the Rio Grande, and as if a child dripped from its hand the sand to build its castle from the hard inshore, I see me say, “Creeley is Giacometti to this place.”
On my fiftieth birthday I was in Cambridge for a year. It chanced that it was also the 350th anniversary of the Blaisdells’ arrival in New England in Richard Mather’s company aboard the Angel Gabriel, tossed ashore over her masts and cracking like a nut on that rocky coast. Not a soul was lost, amazingly, and all those years later the Invitation to the anniversary bid us come and drink in water a toast to our common ancestor–could that really have been the syntax! For my birthday my girlfriend went to the Concord Cemetary, climbed the hill and took a snapshot of Thoreau’s headstone: HENRY is all its granitic slate said.
The locomotive dark still drives toward dawn. Henry said we had constructed an engine worthy of ourselves. He called it Atropos, a fate, one that doesn’t turn aside but keeps going. He said he would like to be a track repairer somewhere in the orbit of the earth.
I spent years asking friends, including you, who it was had said, “a tiny piece of steel, properly placed,” and you all said, “Lew Welch.” Nobody could find it. Eventually it turned up in one of Jonathan Williams’ quote books: it was yours. It had that hard Dickinsonian ring to it. I imagined the train un-derailed, running over the tiny piece of steel, shooting it off the rail, into a poet’s hand, leaving it sharp as a burin–and the poet keys the train, from the locomotive with its slashing Mars-light to the red-eyed disappearance of the caboose.
5/17: I was flipping through Echoes in search of a poem when my eye was caught by a poem inside that you’d inscribed but I had not previously seen: “Pure,” about how it can be an inspiration–indeed, a drawing in of breath–even when the toilet backs up through the bathtub drain while one is showering.
4
That night I crossed over the bridge of dreams, as the nikki say. My mother’s long black hair came out of the drain hole in the tub and lashed itself around my tattooed ankle. I was not terrified, and instead of waking from my nightmare stayed asleep, walked in sleep as I had as a child, down the hall, into the living room, and woke with a book in my hand. I knew where to look even while still dreaming: Basho’s Record of a Weather-Exposed Skeleton.
The great poet returns to his birthplace and is shocked at how everybody has aged. One of his brothers likens him to Urashima, whose hair turned white on opening a miracle box. The brother hands such a box to Basho. It contains his umbilical cord and a lock of his mother’s hair: “Should I hold it in my hand / It would melt in my burning tears / Autumnal frost.”
I know a man whose years of blessings I am honored to return on his birthday. I am so glad he is talking all the time, talking back the surrounding darkness, putting in the candles where they need to be, forgiving and lightening my own once cyclopean dark with his friendship and his poetry.
1996 / 2001 (?)
Undated and unpublished computer-file manuscript. While it was almost certainly composed in May 1996, on the occasion of Robert Creeley’s 70th birthday,this piece was probably revised in the fall of 2001 when Gus submitted it for consideration for possible inclusion in the UNM Press collection, In Company: an Anthology of New Mexico Poets after 1960. It was not used in the anthology, however. In correspondence Gus indicated that he considered this text to be a poem in prose.